CHETNA SHITALKUMAR GORAWALA ,MUMBAI vs. ITO WARD 42(1)(1), MUMBAI
Before: MS. KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL, JM & SHRI. OMKARESHWAR CHIDARA, AM Chetna Shitalkumar Gorawala H11, 403, Palm Acres CHS, MHADA Complex, Sion East, Mumbai – 400022 Vs. ITO Ward 42(1)(1) C41-43, G Block BKC, Gilban Area, Bandra East, Mumbai – 400051. PAN/GIR No. ANXPG2161Q (Assessee) : (Respondent)
Per Kavitha Rajagopal, J M:
This appeal has been filed by the assessee, challenging the order of the learned
Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) 52, Mumbai (‘ld. CIT(A)’ for short), National
Faceless Appeal Centre (‘NFAC’ for short) passed u/s.250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961
(‘the Act'), pertaining to the Assessment Year (‘A.Y.’ for short) 2014-15. 2. The assessee intends to settle the dispute in the present appeal through the Direct Tax
Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 in its submission dated 05.02.2025. and had sought for an adjournment on that date. Today, when the matter came up before us, for hearing, none was present on behalf of the assessee neither was any adjournment application filed.
Chetna Shitalkumar Gorawala
Upon perusal of the records, we deem it fit to dismiss the appeal filed by the assessee as withdrawn with the liberty that the assessee may revive the appeal if the same has not been settled in the DTVSV scheme, if and when necessary. 4. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open court on 24.02.2025 (OMKARESHWAR CHIDARA) JUDICIAL MEMBER Mumbai; Dated: 24.02.2025 Karishma J. Pawar (Stenographer)
Copy of the Order forwarded to:
The Appellant 2. The Respondent 3. CIT- concerned 4. DR, ITAT, Mumbai 5. Guard File BY ORDER,
(Dy./Asstt.