ACIT(E), CIRCLE- 2(1), NEW DELHI vs. NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR HOTEL MANAGEMENT & CATERING TECHNOLOGY, NOIDA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer incorrectly stated that the assessee had not claimed exemption under Section 10(23)(iiiab). The CIT(A) correctly allowed the claim for exemption, treating the assessee's income as NIL, albeit on different grounds than those argued by the assessee.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the deletion of additions made on account of provisions for gratuity and prior period expenses. The assessee, a national educational body, claimed exemptions under Section 10(23C)(vi) and Sections 11 & 12, but did not submit Form 10B with its return.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee was eligible for exemption under Section 10(23C)(vi) or Sections 11 & 12 despite not filing Form 10B with its return. Whether the CIT(A) erred in deleting additions made by the AO.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI “E” BENCH: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI R.K.PANDA & SHRI KUL BHARAT
PER KUL BHARAT, JM :
This appeal filed by the Revenue pertaining to assessment year 2012-13
is directed against the order of Ld. CIT(A)-I, Noida dated 30.03.2017. The Revenue has raised following grounds of appeal:-
“On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, Ld.CIT(A) has erred in law in deleting the addition of Rs.1,85,57,807/- and Rs.24,65,628/- made on account of provisions for gratuity and prior period expenses respectively.
On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, Ld.CIT(A) has erred in allowing the exemptions u/s 11 & 12 even when assessee has not submitted Form 10B alongwith late filing of Income tax Return for A.Y.2012-13. 3. On the facts and ci
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 10(23C)(vi)
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Sri Vijayadurga Educational Society, Kurnool vs Income Tax Officer (Exemptions), TirupatiITA 2006/HYD/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed18 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
- DCIT Exemptions Circle 1(1), Kolkata vs South Point Education Society, KolkataITA 2169/KOL/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed11 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Ajanta Educational Trust, Amritsar vs CIT (Exemptions), ChandigarhITA 276/ASR/2026[2027-28]Status: Disposed31 Aug 2026AY 2027-28
- Sunflower Academy of Education… vs DDIT, VisakhapatnamITA 363/VIZ/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed31 Aug 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026