SURYA SPLENDORA PRIVATE LIMITED,SOMWARPET vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BENGALURU-3, BENGALURU
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal directed the Principal CIT to pass a reasoned order after considering the assessee's submissions and granting a proper opportunity of being heard. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was filed against an order passed by the Principal CIT. The assessee's representative argued that they were not granted a proper opportunity to represent their case before the Principal CIT, as a notice was issued with a short hearing date.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee was provided with a proper opportunity of being heard before the Principal CIT passed the order. The issue of granting a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH : BANGALORE
Before: SMT. BEENA PILLAI & SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU
ORDER PER BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Present appeal has been filed by assessee against order dated 31/03/2021 passed by Ld.Pr.CIT for A.Y. 2016-17.
At the outset, the Ld.AR submitted that assessee could not represent the case before the Ld.Pr.CIT. At the time of hearing, he submitted that a notice u/s. 263 was issued to the assessee on 19/03/2021 fixing the date of hearing on 26/03/2021. The said notice is said to have been sent to the registered email. As there was no compliance on the said date of hearing, the case was posted Page 2 of 30/03/2021 requesting assessee to file details through e-portal. The Ld.AR submitted that Ld.Pr.CIT passed the order on 31/03/2021 and no proper opportunity was granted to assessee. He thus prayed for the issue to be remanded to the Ld.Pr.CIT. The Ld.DR did not object the same.
Considering the submissions by both sides, we direct the Ld.Pr.CIT to pass a reasoned order after considering the submissions by the assessee in accordance with law. Needless to say that proper opportunity of being heard must be granted to assessee in accordance with law. Accordingly the grounds of appeal raised by assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on 26th August, 2022.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jai Ram Gupta vs. The State Of Madhya PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026
- Maa Baglamukhi Construction Thr Propriter Aryan Dhingra vs. The State Of Madhya PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 22 Oct 2026
- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026