DCIT, CIRCLE- 1(1)(1), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, NEW DELHI vs. ASIA SATELLITE TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANY LTD., NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal agreed that if the entire income was offered for taxation and the dispute was settled under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, the Revenue should have no grievance. Therefore, the Revenue's appeal was rendered otiose.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order which held that receipts from customers could not be taxed as Fee for Technical Services (FTS). The assessee stated that the dispute regarding royalty and FTS had been settled under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme.
What were the issues?
Whether receipts from customers can be taxed as Fee for Technical Services (FTS) when the dispute has been settled under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI ‘D’ BENCH,
Before: SHRI N.K. BILLAIYA, & SHRI AMIT SHUKLA
PER N.K. BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:-
This appeal by the Revenue is preferred against the order of the ld. CIT(A)- 42, New Delhi dated 15.09.2017 pertaining to A.Y 2014-15.
The solitary grievance of the Revenue is that the ld. CIT(A) erred in holding that the receipt of assessee from customers cannot be taxed as Fee for Technical Services [FTS] u/s 9(1)(vii) of the Income tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as 'The Act' for short].
At the very outset, the ld. counsel for the assessee stated that the quarrel emanating from the assessment order was that the receipts of the assessee were treated as royalty and also FTS by the Assessing Officer and ld. CIT(A) having convinced himself with the fact that receipts are taxable as royalty, as was done in earlier A.Ys, held that the same receipts cannot be taxed as FTS.
It is the say of the ld. counsel for the assessee that the quarrel relating to entire receipts treated as royalty has been settled under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 and the appeal of the assessee in has been dismissed as withdrawn. Therefore, this appeal of the Revenue should be treated as infructuous.
We have given thoughtful consideration to the contentions of the ld. counsel for the assessee. In our considered opinion, when the entire income has been offered for taxation and the quarrel has been settled under Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, then the Revenue should not have any grievance whatsoever. Accordingly, this appeal of the Revenue becomes otiose.
In the result the appeal of the Revenue in is dismissed.
The order is pronounced in the open court in the presence of both the representatives on 11.10.2021.
More judgments on Section 9(1)(vii)
- Mitsubishi Electric Europe B.V., Netherlands vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, New…ITA 1948/DEL/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Sabre Marketing Nederland, Bv., Netherlands vs ACIT, Circle-3(1)(2), Int. Tax., New DelhiITA 1697/DEL/2022[2019-20]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
- Sabre Marketing Nederland, Bv., Netherlands vs ACIT, Circle-3(1)(2), Int. Tax., New DelhiITA 1696/DEL/2022[2018-19]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Eurofins Peenya Resources Private Limited… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 1116/BANG/2023[2016-17]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 8… vs Aquapharm Chemicals Pvt. Ltd., PuneITA 2150/PUN/2024[2016-17]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Nanda Contruction PVT. LTD., Angul vs. Additional Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, SundergarhOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Utkal Suppliers,Ganjam vs. Assistant Commissioner Of CT And GST, Ganjam-I Circle,GanjamOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of Hte Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026