CEAR INDIA FINANCE PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD -5(4), NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that disallowance under Section 14A cannot be made while computing book profit under Section 115JB. This decision followed precedents from the Hon'ble Special Bench in ACIT vs. Vireet Investment (P) Ltd. and the Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in Sobha Developers Ltd. vs. DCIT.
What were the facts?
The assessee appealed against an order confirming a disallowance under Section 14A while computing book profit under Section 115JB. The disallowance was based on a change of opinion from audit observations, which the assessee argued was not a 'mistake apparent from records' under Section 154.
What were the issues?
Whether disallowance under Section 14A can be made while computing book profit under Section 115JB, and if an assessment order under Section 154 based on audit observations constitutes a 'mistake apparent from records'.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 14A,Section 115JB,Section 154,Section 234B,Section 234C
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Shobha Developers Ltd. v. DCIT (LTU)30 citing434 ITR 266 · 2021 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “B”: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU, HON’BLE & SHRI AMIT SHUKLA
The aforesaid appeal has been filed by the assessee against impugned order dated 26.5.2017, passed by Ld. CIT(Appeals)-2, New Delhi for the quantum of assessment passed u/s 154/143(3) for the assessment year 2012-13. In the grounds of appeal assessee has raised following grounds:-
“Ground No. 1: The Ld. CIT (A)-2 in confirming the order passed by the Ld. Income Tax Officer, Ward 5(4), New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as “learned AO”) has erred in law and in the fact & circumstances of the case by passing the assessment order dated 17th February 2016 under section 154/143(3) of the Act and assessing the total income of the appellant at Rs. 15,11,003 and thereby raising a demand of Rs. 4,37,780. Ground No. 2: The learned CIT(A) has erred on facts and in law in assessing the total income at Rs. 15,11,003 under section 115JB of the Act thereby disallowing expenditure under section 14A amounting to Rs. 15,23,336 on the basis of the change in opinion (observation from the audit party) which cannot be called a 'mistake apparent from records’ under the provisions of section 154 of the Act. The appellant contends that the disallowance made by the learned CIT(A) should be deleted. Ground No. 3: The learned CIT(A) erred in applying rule 8D while calculating the expense incurred in relating to the earning exempt income to be disallowed under the provisions of the Act. Ground No. 4: On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the learned CIT(A) erred in levying interest u/s 234B and 234C of the Act on the disallowances made in the assessment order.”
From the perusal of the impugned order, it is seen that the Ld. CIT (A) has confirmed that disallowance u/s 14A while computing the book profit u/s 115JB. It has been admitted by both the parties that the issue whether any disallowance u/s 14A can be added as book profit or not stands covered by the decision of Hon’ble Special Bench in the case of ACIT vs. Vireet Investment (P) Ltd. and also the decision of Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of Sobha Developers Ltd. vs. DCIT (2021) 434 ITR 266, wherein it has been held that disallowance the computation of book profit u/s 115JB has to be made without resorting to disallowance u/s 14A. Since this is the only issue involved in the present appeal, therefore, respectfully following the aforesaid judgement of special bench of Hon’ble Karnataka High Court we hold that no disallowance u/s 14A can be made while computing the book profit u/s 115JB.
In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed.
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tyre Center vs. The Superintendent Of CGSTAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Ut Corp vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- Sunrise Engineering vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026