VIRTUE ENTERPRISES,MUMBAI vs. ITO, WARD-22(3)(5), MUMBAI
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “F” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI SANDEEP SINGH KARHAILSHRI GIRISH AGRAWALAssessment Year : 2017-18
PER SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL, J.M. 1. The assessee has filed the present appeal challenging the impugned order dated 07.08.2024, passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”) by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals),
2
Virtue Enterprises.
National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, [“learned CIT(A)”], for the assessment year 2017-18. 2. At the time of the hearing, the learned AR of the assessee filed a letter dated 20.01.2025 stating that the assessee has opted for Direct Tax Vivad Se
Vishwas Scheme, 2024 and filed the declaration in Form no.1 on 19.12.2024. Along with the letter mentioned above, the assessee has filed a copy of Form no.2 dated 02.01.2025, whereby the amount to be payable by the assessee towards a full and final settlement of the tax arrears has been determined.
Accordingly, the assessee prayed for the withdrawal of its appeal.
Learned Departmental Representative does not oppose the prayer so made by the assessee.
In view of the aforesaid, we accept the request of the assessee for the withdrawal of the present appeal.
In the result, the appeal by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open Court on 27/02/2025
S /-
GIRISH AGRAWAL
ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL
JUDICIAL MEMBER
MUMBAI, DATED: 27/02/2025
Rahul Sharma, Sr. P.S.
3
Virtue Enterprises.
Copy of the order forwarded to:
(1)
The Assessee;
(2)
The Revenue;
(3)
The PCIT / CIT (Judicial);
(4)
The DR, ITAT, Mumbai; and (5)
Guard file.
By Order