M/S. ATHARVASS TRADERS LLP (EARLIER ATHARVASS TRADERS PRIVATE LIMITED),BENGALURU vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1)(2), BENGALURU

PDF · subscribers
ITA 754/BANG/2022Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 September 2022AY 2016-173 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found that the assessee was not granted sufficient opportunity and that verification was lacking. Therefore, the issue was remanded to the AO for de novo consideration with proper opportunity to the assessee.

What were the facts?

The assessee failed to file documentation for creditors before the Assessing Officer (AO) but provided details to the CIT(A). The CIT(A) called for a remand report, but necessary verification was not conducted.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessee was granted sufficient opportunity of being heard and whether proper verification of creditor details was conducted.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 68

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ BENCH : BANGALORE

Before: SMT. BEENA PILLAI & SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU

For Appellant: Smt. Preethi, Advocate, Smt. Priyadarshini

ORDER

PER BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Present appeal is filed by assessee against order dated 15/07/2022 passed by Ld.CIT(A)-11, Bangalore for A.Y. 2016-17.

2.

Assessee has raised Ground no. 2 wherein a plea of non- granting of sufficient opportunity of being heard has been alleged.

3.

On perusal of the record, we note that assessee was not able to file the evidences / documentation in respect of the creditors Page 2 of Ld.AO however details were filed before the Ld.CIT(A). The Ld.CIT(A) had called for a remand report in which necessary verification based on the details filed were not conducted. In the interest of justice, we deem it appropriate to remand this issue back to the Ld.AO for a de novo consideration and the alleged issue before this Tribunal by assessee.

4.

Assessee is directed to file all relevant information / details before the assessing officer in accordance with the requirement of section 68 and the assessing officer shall verify the same in accordance with law. Needless to say that proper opportunity must be granted to assessee in accordance with law. The Ld.AO shall pass a detailed order on merits having regard to various principles laid down by various High Courts as well as Hon’ble Supreme Court. Accordingly, the grounds raised by assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on 29th September, 2022.

More judgments on Section 68

All 29,931 judgments and leading authorities on Section 68 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →