M/S. ATHARVASS TRADERS LLP (EARLIER ATHARVASS TRADERS PRIVATE LIMITED),BENGALURU vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1)(2), BENGALURU
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the assessee was not granted sufficient opportunity and that verification was lacking. Therefore, the issue was remanded to the AO for de novo consideration with proper opportunity to the assessee.
What were the facts?
The assessee failed to file documentation for creditors before the Assessing Officer (AO) but provided details to the CIT(A). The CIT(A) called for a remand report, but necessary verification was not conducted.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee was granted sufficient opportunity of being heard and whether proper verification of creditor details was conducted.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ BENCH : BANGALORE
Before: SMT. BEENA PILLAI & SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU
ORDER
PER BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Present appeal is filed by assessee against order dated 15/07/2022 passed by Ld.CIT(A)-11, Bangalore for A.Y. 2016-17.
Assessee has raised Ground no. 2 wherein a plea of non- granting of sufficient opportunity of being heard has been alleged.
On perusal of the record, we note that assessee was not able to file the evidences / documentation in respect of the creditors Page 2 of Ld.AO however details were filed before the Ld.CIT(A). The Ld.CIT(A) had called for a remand report in which necessary verification based on the details filed were not conducted. In the interest of justice, we deem it appropriate to remand this issue back to the Ld.AO for a de novo consideration and the alleged issue before this Tribunal by assessee.
Assessee is directed to file all relevant information / details before the assessing officer in accordance with the requirement of section 68 and the assessing officer shall verify the same in accordance with law. Needless to say that proper opportunity must be granted to assessee in accordance with law. The Ld.AO shall pass a detailed order on merits having regard to various principles laid down by various High Courts as well as Hon’ble Supreme Court. Accordingly, the grounds raised by assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on 29th September, 2022.
More judgments on Section 68
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Bliss Dealtrade Private Limited, Kolkata vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 9(2) Kolkata…ITA 208/KOL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026