ACIT- CIRCLE-6(2)(1), MUMBAI vs. CG POWER & INDUSTRIAL SOLUTION LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS CROMPTON GREAVES LTD.), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the deletion of interest disallowance under Section 14A based on the assessee's own funds exceeding investments. The expenditure disallowance under Section 14A was restored to the AO for factual verification. Other claims by the assessee were either dismissed or restored.
What were the facts?
The assessee company, engaged in manufacturing and sales of various appliances, had dividend income and claimed deductions under various sections. The Assessing Officer made additions, and the CIT(A) granted partial relief, leading to cross-appeals.
What were the issues?
The key issues involved disallowance of expenses related to exempt income, claims for deductions on scientific research expenditure, and the head under which rental and service charge income should be assessed.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(7)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. HDFC Bank Ltd.1,261 citing366 ITR 505 · 2014 · HC
- ACIT v. Vireet Investment Pvt. Ltd.882 citing165 ITD 27 · 2017 · ITAT
- Cummins India Ltd. v. DCIT67 citing96 Taxmann.com 576 · 2018 · ITAT · Read judgment
- CIT v. Mahalaxmi Glass Works (P) Ltd.64 citing318 ITR 116 · 2009 · HC
- Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. v. Pr.CIT47 citing162 ITD 484 · 2017 · ITAT
- CIT v. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.34 citing250 Taxmann 270 · 2017 · HC
- Control & Switchgear Co. Ltd. v. DCIT3 citing66 DTR 161 · 2012 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” Bench, Mumbai
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
Per B.R.Baskaran (AM) :-
These cross appeals are directed against the order passed by Learned CIT(A)-12, Mumbai and they relate to the assessment year 2010-11. 2. The assessee is in appeal in respect of the following issues
a) disallowance made under section 14A of the Act b) disallowance made under section 35(2AB) of the Act c) disallowance made under section 8
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026