LONGRANGE COMMODITIES PVT. LTD.,MUMBAI vs. PR. CIT -8, MUMBAI, MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 335/MUM/2022Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 November 2022AY 2017-183 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal noted that the AO had already passed a re-assessment order giving effect to the PCIT's order. Therefore, the appeal challenging the PCIT's order was rendered infructuous.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) under section 263. The Assessing Officer (AO) subsequently passed a re-assessment order giving effect to the PCIT's order.

What were the issues?

Whether an appeal against a PCIT's order under section 263 becomes infructuous once the AO has passed a re-assessment order giving effect to it.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 263,Section 143(3)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, MUMBAI

Before: SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JM & SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, AM

Hearing: 03/11/2022Pronounced: 28/11/2022

O R D E R

PER ABY T. VARKEY, JM:

1.

This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of the Ld. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-08, Mumbai dated 22.02.2021 for assessment year 2017-18 passed under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”).

2.

At the outset, the Ld. CIT-DR brought to our notice that this is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of the Ld. PCIT u/s 263 of the Act dated 22.02.2021; and the AO has already given effect to the order of the Ld. PCIT by passing the re-assessment order dated 28.03.2022 and has placed before us the copy of re-assessment order dated 28.03.2022 passed by AO u/s 143(3) read with section 263 of the Act. Therefore, according to the Ld. CIT-DR, the appeal of the assessee challenging the action of Ld. PCIT has become infructuous in 2 A.Y. 2017-18 Longrange Commodities Pvt. Ltd. the light of the aforesaid facts. We note that despite notice none- appeared on behalf of the assessee on 11.08.2022 as well as 02.11.2022. Therefore, we are inclined to dispose of the appeal ex- parte qua assessee and in the light of the subsequent development that the AO has already given effect to the impugned order of the Ld. PCIT. Therefore, without going into the merits of the grounds raised by the assessee which are left open, we dismiss the appeal of the assessee.

More judgments on Section 263

All 13,616 judgments and leading authorities on Section 263 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →