DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-5(2)(1), MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. ADITYA BIRLA HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED, MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that adjustments made in a Section 143(1) intimation merge with the subsequent Section 143(3) assessment order, allowing them to be challenged in appeal against the latter. For one assessment year, the deletion of Section 43B additions was set aside and remanded for fresh consideration.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order which allowed the assessee's appeal against the assessment order. The CIT(A) had deleted additions made under Section 43B and granted credit for additional TDS, which the Revenue contended were adjustments made in a Section 143(1) intimation that was not separately appealed.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) was justified in entertaining grounds challenging Section 143(1) adjustments in an appeal against a Section 143(3) order, and whether a remand report was necessary for such issues.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 43B,Section 143(1),Section 143(3),Section 250,Section 36(1)(va)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, MUMBAI
आदेश की प्रतितिति अग्रेतिि/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपील र्थी / The Appellant 2. प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent. 3. आयकर आय क्त/ The CIT 4. प्रध न आयकर आय क्त / Pr.CIT 5. दिभ गीय प्रदिदनदध ,आयकर अपीलीय अदधकरण ,म ुंबई / DR, ITAT, Mumbai 6. ग र्ड फ ईल / Guard file.
आिेश न स र/ BY ORDER, सत्य दपि प्रदि //True Copy// उप/सह यक पुंजीक र /(Dy./Asstt. Registrar) आयकर अपीलीय अदधकरण, म ुंबई / ITAT, Mumbai , 4610 & 4609/Mum/2024 AY 2020-2021, 2021-2022 & 2022-2023
1 Typed/Dictated directly on Sr.PS/PS PC 2 Draft Placed before author Sr.PS/PS 3 Draft proposed & placed JM/AM before the Second Member 4 Draft discussed/approved JM/AM by Second Member 5 Approved Draft comes to Sr.PS/PS the Sr.PS/PS 6 Order pronouncement on Sr.PS/PS 7 File sent to the Bench Sr.PS/PS Clerk 8 Date on which the file goes to the Head clerk 9 Date on which file goes to the AR 10 Date of Dispatch of order
More judgments on Section 43B
- Vco Consulatatns and Sevices Private… vs ITO, Corporate Ward 3(3), ChennaiITA 2145/CHNY/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Siemens Gamesa Renewable Power Private… vs The Dy CIT Circle 8(2)(1), MumbaiITA 8020/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Amritvarsha Industries Limited, Ambedkar… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 6481/DEL/2026[2010-2011]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2010-2011
- Karaj Singh, Haryana vs PCIT (Central) Gurgaon, GurgaonITA 642/CHANDI/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- ACIT, Mumbai vs Imp Powers Limited, MumbaiITA 4982/MUM/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of Hte Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Govindjee Dairy Milk Private Limited vs. Central Goods And Services TaxRajasthan · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026