ARYA FINANCIAL AND INVESTMENT CONSULTANCY SERVICES PVT LTD,MUMBAI vs. ITO, WARD 6(1)(1), MUMBAI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order, acknowledging that the assessee's grievance was resolved by the AO's rectification. The decision was based on the peculiar facts and not to be treated as a precedent.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an intimation under Section 143(1) where the CPC assessed a higher income than returned. While the appeal was pending, the assessee got the mistake rectified by the AO through a rectification application.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal before the CIT(A) is maintainable when the issue raised has been rectified by the Assessing Officer, rendering the grievance moot.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH,
Before: SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JM & SHRI M. BALAGANESH, AM
O R D E R
PER ABY T. VARKEY, JM:
This is an appeal preferred by the assessee an individual against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/NFAC. Delhi dated 14.08.2022 for AY. 2020-21.
At the outset, the Ld. AR of the assessee brought to our notice that this is a peculiar case wherein the assessee had filed an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A)/NFAC against order/intimation passed by CPC, Bangalore u/s 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter “the Act”). 3 The CPC vide intimation dated 23.12.2021 assessed total income of assessee at Rs.9,63,080/- whereas the assessee had returned an income to the tune of Rs.4,05,130/-. Against this intimation dated 23.12.2021, the assessee filed an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A)/NFAC on 19.01.2022; and when the appeal was pending before the Ld. 2 A.Y. 2020-21 Arya Financial and Investment Consultancy Services P. Ltd. CIT(A), the assessee simultaneously filed an application before AO for rectification of the mistake made by CPC in the intimation dated 23.12.2021, which was allowed by the AO. Thus, according to assessee there was no grievance left for the assessee, since the mistake in the intimation dated 23.12.2021 has been rectified by the AO. Even though this fact was brought to the notice of the Ld. CIT(A), he took a stand that since there was certain mistake while filing the return of income, the CPC was correct for making the addition of Rs.5,57,950/-. Therefore, he dismissed the appeal of the assessee. Be that as it may, we note that the assessee’s grievance has been taken cognizance by the AO and the assessee has been given relief as submitted by Ld. AR before us. So without going into the merits of the case, we set aside the impugned order of the Ld. CIT(A) dated 14.08.2022 for AY. 2020-21 in the light of the action of AO in the rectification application filed u/s 154 of the Act; and taking into consideration the peculiar facts of the case, this action of ours will not be cited as a precedent since it was on the facts as noted (supra).
More judgments on Section 154
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Rakesh Kumar Malani, JaipurITA 1425/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Anita Sharma, JaipurITA 1344/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Ramtirath Bawa, Nagpur vs ITO Ward3(4), NagpurITA 327/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Mohinder Singh, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 3(4), NagpurITA 322/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026