← Back to search

MANSUKHLAL HARIDAS SHAH (HUF),MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD, 1(2), THANE

PDF
ITA 3301/MUM/2024[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 March 20252 pages

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai “K(SMC

Before: Smt. Kavitha Rajagopal (JM) & Shri Omkareshwar Chidara (AM)

For Appellant: Shri Prince Thakur on behalf of Nilesh Joshi
For Respondent: Shri Kiran Unavekar
Hearing: 20/02/2025Pronounced: 04/03/2025

Per Omkareshwar Chidara (AM) :-

In the above captioned appeals, the appellant filed appeals with the ITAT on the issue of unexplained expenditure added by the Ld. AO.

2.

On the date of hearing before the ITAT, Ld. AR of the appellant Shri Nilesh Joshi filed a letter dated 20.2.2025 stating that the appellant has opted for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 and filed declaration under Form No. 1 of DTVSV 2024 and requested the Bench to withdraw the appeal in both assessment years 2008-09 & 2009-10. Ld. DR did not object for the same.

4.

Appeals of appellant are dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open Court on 04/03/2025. (KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

2
Mumbai; Dated: 04/03/2025

Copy of the Order forwarded to :

1.

The Appellant 2. The Respondent. 3. CIT 4. DR, ITAT, Mumbai 5. Guard file.

BY ORDER,

////

(

MANSUKHLAL HARIDAS SHAH (HUF),MUMBAI vs INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD, 1(2), THANE | BharatTax