SRF LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE- 1, LTU, NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that education cess is not a disallowable expenditure under Section 40(a)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, as it is not considered a tax. Consequently, the deduction for education cess was allowed.
What were the facts?
The assessee, SRF Limited, received Rs. 93,85,40,499 from the transfer of Certified Emission Reductions (CERs) or carbon credits. The assessee claimed these receipts as capital in nature, while the revenue authorities treated them as perquisite under Section 28(iv) and taxable as business income.
What were the issues?
The primary issues were whether the receipts from the transfer of CERs are capital or revenue in nature, and whether education cess is a disallowable expenditure.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(17)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. v. CIT5,834 citing229 ITR 383 · 1998 · SC
- Goetze (India) Ltd. v. CIT1,842 citing284 ITR 323 · 2006 · SC
- Sesa Goa Ltd. v. JCIT291 citing117 Taxmann.com 96 · 2020 · HC
- CIT v. Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd.164 citing302 CTR 213 · 2018 · SC
- CIT v. My Home Power Ltd.123 citing365 ITR 82 · 2014 · HC
- Chambal Fertilisers & Chemicals Ltd. v. JCIT49 citing107 Taxmann.com 484 · 2019 · HC
- CIT v. Subhash Kabil Power Corporation Ltd.40 citing69 Taxmann.com 394 · 2016 · HC
- CIT v. Maheshwari Devi Jute Mills Ltd.35 citing57 ITR 36 · 1965 · SC
- Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax v. L.H. Sugar Factory Pvt. Ltd.26 citing392 ITR 568 · 2017 · HC
- ACIT v. Gurjargravures (P.) Ltd.21 citing47 Taxmann.com 416 · 2014 · ITAT
- 510 (Karnataka); (vii) PCIT v. Ankit Metal & Power Ltd.13 citing109 Taxmann 93 · 2019 · HC
- Harissons Malayalam Ltd. v. ACIT13 citing32 SOT 497 · 2009 · ITAT
- DCIT v. Kalpataru Power Transmission Ltd.12 citing68 Taxmann.com 237 · 2016 · ITAT
- Smith Kline Amp; French (India) Ltd. and Ors. v. CIT12 citing219 ITR 581 · 1996 · SC
- 385 ITR 592 (Kar. H.C.) 13. CIT v. VMD Mills P. Ltd.8 citing434 ITR 671 · 2021 · HC
- CIT v. Tamil Nadu Newsprint & Papers Ltd.8 citing130 Taxmann.com 213 · 2021 · HC
- Asstt. CIT v. Nilgiri Tea Estate Ltd.3 citing47 Taxmann.com 329 · 2014
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH‘G’: NEW DELHI
PER SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JM:
This appeal is preferred by the assessee against order dated
2018 passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax
(Appeals)-22, New Delhi {CIT(A)} and pertains to Assessment Year 2006-
The grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are as under:
That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)- 22, New Delhi erred in upholding that the receipt from transfer of Carbon Emission Reduction (“CER”) of Rs.93,85,40,499/- is perquisite under section 28(iv) of SRF Ltd. vs. ACIT
Income tax Act and chargeable to tax as profits and gains from business
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 28(iv)
- Bharat Cottage Industries, Mumbai vs Circle 41(4)(1), MumbaiITA 2904/MUM/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- Marvel Infrabuild Private Limited, Kadugodi… vs ITO, Ward-4(1)(3), BangaloreITA 2206/BANG/2024[2014-15]Status: Disposed8 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
- Lotus Refineries Private Limited, Chandigarh vs ACIT, ChandigarhITA 450/CHANDI/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed1 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
- JCIT(OSD), Range-10, ITO C.R. Building vs Gem Agrofoods Pvt. Ltd., Shanti NiketanITA 1227/DEL/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed21 Aug 2026AY 2014-15
- DCIT Circle Gandhinagar, Gandhinagar vs Rajena Agro Products Private Limited, PatanITA 2096/AHD/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Aug 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetanj Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Namita Behera vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Ratul Boro vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Jashwant Sharma vs. The Union Of INDIA And A4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026