← Back to search

LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. ACIT,CC-5(4),, MUMBAI

PDF
ITA 3703/MUM/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai06 March 20252 pages

Before: SHRI. OM PRAKASH KANT, AM & MS. KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL, JM Larsen & Toubro Limited L & T House, N. M. Marg, Ballard Estate, Mumbai – 400001. Vs. ACIT-CC-5(4) Room No. 436, 4th Floor, Kautilya Bhavan, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra East, Mumbai - 400051. PAN/GIR No. AAACL0140P (Assessee) : (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri. Ronak Doshi
For Respondent: Shri. Ram Krishn Kedia, SR. DR.
Hearing: 05.03.2025Pronounced: 06.03.2025

Per Kavitha Rajagopal, J M:

This appeal has been filed by the assessee, challenging the order of the learned
Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) 53, Mumbai (‘ld. CIT(A)’ for short), passed u/s .250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act'), pertaining to the Assessment Year
(‘A.Y.’ for short) 2016-17. 2. The learned Authorised Representative (ld. AR for short) for the assessee filed an application dated 04.03.2025 stating that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute through the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 along with the relevant forms as per the DTVSV 2024 scheme.
Larsen & Toubro Limited

3.

Upon perusal of the same, we deem it fit to dismiss the appeal filed by the assessee as withdrawn with the liberty that the assessee may revive the appeal if the same has not been settled in the DTVSV scheme, if and when necessary. 4. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open court on 06.03.2025 (OM PRAKASH KANT) JUDICIAL MEMBER

Mumbai; Dated: 06.03.2025
Karishma J. Pawar (Stenographer)

Copy of the Order forwarded to:

1.

The Appellant 2. The Respondent 3. CIT- concerned 4. DR, ITAT, Mumbai 5. Guard File BY ORDER,

(Dy./Asstt.

LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs ACIT,CC-5(4),, MUMBAI | BharatTax