CIT vs. NATIONAL TRAVEL SERVICES

ITA - 309 / 2011HC Delhi11 July 201130 pages
For Petitioner: KAMAL SAWHNEY
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the High Court hold?

The Tribunal held that for the purposes of Section 2(22)(e), a partnership firm should be treated as a shareholder, even if it is not a registered shareholder. The plain literal interpretation leading to absurd results should be avoided.

What were the facts?

The case involves a partnership firm receiving loans or advances from a company. The Revenue argued that these payments should be treated as deemed dividends under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act.

What were the issues?

Whether a partnership firm can be considered a shareholder for the purpose of deemed dividend provisions under Section 2(22)(e) when it receives loans or advances from a company.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 2(22)(e)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cited by 23 judgments on BharatTax

See all citing judgments →

Counted from the text of the judgments hosted here. Most recent first.

Cases cited in this judgment(4)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

% V IIV ITA 219 OF 2010 ITA 219 OF 2010 ITA'1204'OF 2010 1TA"3d9pF-20il ... n n n! , : ILidament Reserved on: 24.5.2011 ludament delivered on: 11.07.2011 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX . . . APPELLANT / - ^ ^ ; Through;^ Ms.:Prem Lata Bansal, Sn r AdvoGate with Mr/Ruchir Bhatia, '■■ .V; "Advocat0.^..■;' Mr. Kirah Babu, Advocate v;' / M : ■ Standing Counsei. '/ ; : '-versus' , , M/S NATIONAL TRAVEL SERVICES , . RESPONDENT ^ y Through; JMr. M.S. Syali, Sr. Advocate with - Mr. ; U-A- , Rana, Mr. Mrinal ; ; , ■ : : Mazuhidar and M ' y- T Advocates; - y-' '; 121 ITA 1204 OF 2010 COMMISSIONER QF INCOME TAX ■ ■ i APPELLANT through: Ms. Prem Lata Bansai, Sr. : Advocate: with M y- ■ Advocate.-;:; -t-: ' ; Mr. Kiran Babu, Advocate t ■ y; ■ Mr. Kamai Sawhney, Sr. Standing Counsei. , ^ tyC:- - -'. - yy-'; M/S NATIONAL TRAVEL SERVICES , . .RESPONPENT ; ; Through: Mr. M.S. Syali,jSr; Advocate with y ; v ; t/lr. ; U.A: : Rana^^ Mr; : Mrinal Mazumdar and Ms. Husnai Syali Advocates. ; 2011:DHC:14828-DB

f3VITA 309 OF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - APPELLANT V ; Through: Ms. Prem Lata Bansal, Sr. n Cr. n ; ; Advocate with Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, ./-v'"' '■'^^;Advocat

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 2(22)(e)

All 1,757 judgments and leading authorities on Section 2(22)(e) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →