DCIT(IT)-3(2)(1), MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. MCKINSEY AND COMPANY KOMMANDITBOLAG, SWEDEN
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘I’ BENCH
MUMBAI
BEFORE: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER
&
SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
DCIT (IT)-3(2)(1)
16th Floor, Room No.1632
Air India Building
Nariman Point
Mumbai-400 021
Vs. Mckinsey And Company
Kommanditbolag,
Sweden
C/o.
SRBC and Associates
LLP 19th Floor
The Ruby, 29, Senapati
Bapat Marg
Dadar West
Mumbai – 400 028
PAN/GIR No.AAVFM4517F
(Appellant)
..
(Respondent)
Assessee by Shri Divesh Chawla (Virtually
Present)
Revenue by Shri Krishna Kumar (Sr. DR)
Date of Hearing
10/03/2025
Date of Pronouncement
10/03/2025
आदेश / O R D E R
PER AMIT SHUKLA (JM):
The aforesaid appeal has been filed by the Revenue against order passed by CIT(A)-57,
Mumbai dated
27/04/2023
for the quantum of assessment passed u/s.143(3) for the A.Y.2014-15. Dineshchandra Mulji Karia
2
2. Ld. Counsel for the assessee has submitted a letter dated 12/12/2024 requesting for withdrawal of the aforesaid appeal as assessee has opted for settlement of its tax dispute under the ‘Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme-2024’.
Accordingly, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed as withdrawn, however, liberty is given to the assessee in case the application for VSVS does not materialize and is not accepted, assessee may file an application for restoration of the appeal. Accordingly, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed.
In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed.
Order pronounced on 10th March, 2025. (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV) (AMIT SHUKLA)
ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
JUDICIAL MEMBER
Mumbai; Dated 10/03/2025
KARUNA, sr.ps
Copy of the Order forwarded to :
BY ORDER,
(Asstt.