ASHISH SURESHKUMAR RUIA,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER 23(1)(6), MUMBAI

PER OM PRAKASH KANT, AM

This appeal has been preferred by the assessee against order dated 14.10.20224 passed by the Ld. National Faceless Appeal
Centre, Delhi for assessment year 2014-15. 2. Before us, the Ld. counsel for the assessee submitted that assessee has already opted under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024

for settlement of iss
The Ld. counsel for prescribed under th placed on record. In the assessee under V the assessee is dee granted liberty for fi the application of th does not go through.
3. In the result, dismissed.
Order pronoun (KAVITHA RA
JUDICIAL M
Mumbai;
Dated: 11/03/2025
Rahul Sharma, Sr. P.S.

Copy of the Order forward
1. The Appellant
2. The Respondent.
3. CIT
4. DR, ITAT, Mumbai
5. Guard file.

////

Ash
ITA ue in dispute involved in the the assessee has filed a copy he Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, view of the settlement of the d
Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024
emed to be withdrawn, but t iling application for reviving the he assessee under Vivad Se V the appeal of the assessee ced in the open Court on 11/0
-
S
AJAGOPAL)
(OM PRAK
MEMBER
ACCOUNTA ded to :

BY ORDER

(Assistant Re

ITAT, Mu hish Sureshkumar Ruia
2
A No. 6445/MUM/2024
present appeal.
y of Form No. 1
2024 which is dispute opted by 4, this appeal of the assessee is e appeal in case
Vishwas Scheme is accordingly
03/2025. KASH KANT)
ANT MEMBER
R, gistrar) umbai