HARPAL SINGH,VEER ENCLAVE NEAR RYAN INTL SCHOOL G T ROAD AMRITS vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(1), CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING THE MALL
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal held that the ex parte order passed by the CIT(A) was without issuing notice to the correct e-mail id, violating the principles of natural justice. Therefore, the matter was remanded back to the first appellate authority.
What were the facts?
The assessee deposited cash of Rs. 44.42 lakhs in bank accounts during FY 2011-12. Proceedings under Section 147 were initiated, and the assessment was completed ex parte. The first appellate authority also dismissed the appeal ex parte without deciding on merits.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in passing an ex parte order without proper opportunity and notice to the assessee, thereby violating principles of natural justice.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR.
Before: SH. UDAYAN DASGUPTA & SH. KRINWANT SAHAY
Per: Udayan Dasgupta, J.M.: This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of ld. CIT (A), NFAC, Delhi, passed u/s 250 of the Act, 1961 vide order dated 31.01.2024 which has emanated from the order of AO, Ward-4 (2), Amritsar, passed u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 of the Act, vide order dated 09.12.2019. I.T.A. No. 417/Asr/2025 2 Assessment Year: 2012-13
Condonation of delay: It is pointed out by the registry that this appeal is belatedly filed by 408 (four hundred eight days). The assessee has filed an application for condonation of delay on the ground that the appeal order dated 31.01.2024 should have been appealed within 60 days but the said order has not
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Dev Construction vs. The Proper OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Abbal Dass Arya vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services Tax CommissionerUttarakhand · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Darbesh Medical Enterprise vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 15 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026