SHRI LALJI MAHARAJ MANDIR TRUST,SURAT vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the activities of the assessee, as per audited financials, matched the objects mentioned in the trust deed. The objects were not restricted to a particular community. The CIT(E) failed to demonstrate that expenditures were not for the general public. Therefore, the rejection of the application was not justifiable.
What were the facts?
The assessee trust applied for registration under Section 12AB. The application was initially rejected by the CIT(E). The Tribunal had previously set aside the issue to the CIT(E), who again rejected the application. The CIT(E) rejected the application primarily on the ground that the re-drafted trust deed was not approved by the Charity Commissioner.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(E) was justified in rejecting the application for registration under Section 12AB when the trust's activities aligned with its objects and previous directions of the Tribunal were not properly considered?
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT “DB” BENCH, SURAT
Before: Dr. BRR Kumar, Hon’ble & Ms. Suchitra Kamble
आदेश/ORDER Per Suchitra Kamble, Judicial Member:
This is an appeal filed against the order dated 21-05- 2025 passed by CIT(E) for assessment year 2022-23.
The grounds of appeal are as under:- “(1) The order of the CIT(E) subsequent to the directions of the Tribunal is barred by limitation. (2) On the facts and circumstances of the case and under the law, the learned CIT(E) was not justified in rejecting application u/s.12AB.
(3) The appellant having complied with the directions of the Tribunal in the first round, the learned CIT(E) should have granted registration u/s. 12A. (4) Although fully complied, the learned CIT(E) was driven by extraneous consideration in rejecting the application u/s. 12AB. (5) Despite Tribunal holding that the revised Trust Deed had objects which were elaboration of primary object and that activities were not other than for the purpose of religious or charitable, the learned CIT(E) rejected the application u/s. 12AB. (6) The above grounds are prejudiced to one another. (7) The appellant craves leave to add, alter or vary any of the grounds of appeal.”
3. The assessee has made an application u/s. 12AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 seeking registration vide application dated 22-09-2022. The said application was rejected vide order dated 30-03-2023. Against the said order, the applicant filed an appeal before the Tribunal and vide order 17-07-2023, the Tribunal set aside the issue to the file of the CIT(E). The CIT(E) observed that the assessee was granted provisional approval in Form 10AC under sub-section (vi) of clause (ac) of sub-section (1) of section 12A on 16-02-2022 from assessment year 2022-23. The assessee was called upon to file certain details and the applicant submitted re-drafted trust deed before the CIT(E). The CIT(E) rejected the application on the ground that the assessee submitted only re-drafted trust deed which was not approved by the Charity Commissioner and hence could not verify the activity. The applicant filed the present appeal before the Tribunal on the ground that the same issue was raised in first round vide notice dated 11-03-2023 and was accepted and the issue which was already been reviewed and accepted was again taken into consideration and rejected on the very same ground Shri Lalji Maharaj Mandir Trust, A.Y.2022-23 by the CIT(E). The ld. A.R. pointed out that the activities undertaken as per audited financials matches with the objects specified in the trust deed (PTR).
The ld. D.R. relied upon the order of the CIT(E).
We have heard both the parties and perused the material available on record. It is pertinent to note that the applicant was carrying out the activities as per the audited financials which are identical to that of the objects mentioned in the PTR as well as in the redrafted trust deed. From the perusal of the redrafted deed, the object are not restricted to one particular community only but for all communities without any discrimination based on caste, creed, gender or religion. The CIT(E) could not point out from the financials that the expenditure was incurred for specific community only and not to the general public at large. Thus, it will be appropriate to allow the application of the trust for registration u/s. 12AB. Thus, the rejection is not justifiable and the plea of the applicant is allowed.
More judgments on Section 12AB
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sheo Narayan Trust, Khajpura vs CIT Exemption, PatnaITA 554/PAT/2026[2025-2026]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-2026
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Ritik vs. State Of M.P.Madhya Pradesh · 16 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026