CENTRE FOR PUBLIC INITIATIVE,DELHI vs. CIT EXEMPTION, DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 7573/DEL/2025Status: DisposedITAT Delhi02 April 2026AY 2026-273 pages
AI SummaryAllowed for statistical purposes

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that while the assessee failed to provide the required information, it is important to ensure natural justice. Therefore, the matter was restored back to the CIT(Exemption) for fresh adjudication, with directions to the assessee to submit all requisite information.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed appeals against the orders rejecting its applications for registration under sections 12A(1)(ac)(iii) and 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act. The assessee had failed to provide necessary details regarding its charitable activities and financials to the CIT(Exemption).

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(Exemption) was justified in rejecting the registration applications due to non-submission of details, and if the assessee should be granted a further opportunity to present its case.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii),Section 80G(5)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘E’: NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH & SHRI MANISH AGARWAL

For Appellant: Shri Divya Prakash, CA
For Respondent: Shri Sumer Singh Meena, CIT- DR
Hearing: 30/03/2026Pronounced: 30/03/2026

O R D E R

PER MANISH AGARWAL, AM:

1.

The captioned two separate appeals are filed by the assessee against the separate orders passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Delhi [CIT(E), in short] dated 24.09.2025 wherein the assessee has challenged the action of the Ld. CIT(E) of rejecting the approval/registration sought u/s u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) and 80G(5) of the of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred as ‘the Act’).

2.

It is observed that Ld. CIT(E) has denied the registration u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) as the assessee has failed to provide the details as sought for time to time and thus, the Ld. CIT(E) was the opinion that the assessee has failed to substantiate the Centre for Public Initiative vs. CIT genuineness of its activity. Likewise in absence of the requisite details registration u/s 80G(5) was also denied.

3.

Before us, the Ld. AR of the assessee submits that the assessee though was not able to file the details before the Ld. CIT(E), however, he requested that assessee may be granted one more opportunities to represent its case before the Ld. CIT(E) to file the documentary evidences as required by Ld. CIT(E).

4.

In reply, the Ld. CIT-DR supported the orders of Ld. CIT(E) and requested for the confirmation of the same.

5.

We have heard the rival submissions and perused the material before us. It is observed that Ld. CIT(E), on various occasions asked the assessee to file the details like list of beneficiaries of charitable activities undertaken, complete financials along with corresponding bills, cash & bank book/ledger etc. in support of its claim. However, the assessee has failed to file any such information before the Ld. CIT(E), thus, the CIT(E) has denied the registration u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Act by observing that in absence of the details called for, the claim of charitable activities could not be verified.

6.

Under these facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of natural justice, the matter is restored back to the file of Ld. CIT(E) for fresh adjudication in accordance with law after providing reasonable opportunities to the assessee. The Assesse is also directed to file all the requisite information/evidences before the Ld. CIT(E) in order to establish the genuineness of the activity of assessee society. With these directions both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.

More judgments on Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii)

All 1,616 judgments and leading authorities on Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →