INDIAWIN SPORTS PRIVATE LTD.,MUMBAI vs. DCIT, C.C.-6(2), MUMBAI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee to withdraw its appeal. The reasoning was based on the assessee's submission that it had opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024, and had received a certificate (Form No. 2) from the designated authority determining the tax payable as Rs. NIL. The Tribunal noted that the assessee had filed Form 1 on 14/02/2025 and Form 2 was received. Considering these submissions, the appeal was permitted to be withdrawn. The grounds raised by the assessee were accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. The Tribunal granted liberty to the assessee to review the order if circumstances warranted. The operative direction was that the appeal filed by the assessee stands dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Indiawin Sports Private Ltd, filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, against an order dated 09/10/2023 passed by the CIT(A)-54, Mumbai, for the assessment year 2020-21. The assessee, through its authorized representative, submitted that it had opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas (VSV) Scheme, 2024. The assessee had filed a declaration and waiver in Form No. 1 with the Designated Authority on 27 December 2024. Subsequently, the assessee received a Certificate in Form No. 2, dated 14 February 2025, which determined the tax payable as Rs. NIL. Based on these developments, the assessee sought to withdraw the present appeal.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the assessee is entitled to withdraw its appeal before the Tribunal in light of its opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024, and receiving a certificate determining tax payable as Rs. NIL? Assessee's Contentions: The assessee argued that it has opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024, and has filed the necessary declarations and received a certificate (Form No. 2) from the designated authority indicating a tax payable of Rs. NIL. Therefore, it seeks to withdraw the pending appeal before the Tribunal. Revenue's Contentions: The judgment does not record any specific contentions from the Revenue. The appeal is being disposed of based on the assessee's submission and the documents filed.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SMT. BEENA PILLAI & SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL
Per: Smt. Beena Pillai, J.M.: The Present appeal filed by the assessee arise out of order dated 09/10/2023 passed by Ld.CIT(A)-54, Mumbai.
At the outset, the Ld.AR submitted that, assessee has opted for VSV Scheme and is seeking to withdraw the present appeal. He submitted that though Form 2 is received by the assessee A.Y. 2020-21 Indiawin Sports Private Ltd pursuant to which the assessee intends to withdraw the present appeal. Scanned and reproduced herewith is the withdrawal letter filed by the assessee:
A.Y. 2020-21 Indiawin Sports Private Ltd 3. It is noted that the assessee has filed application in Form 1 on 14/02/2025 and Form 2, is awaited. Considering the submissions of the assessee, the appeal is allowed to be withdrawn, with liberty to review the order if circumstance so warrant.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026