UTV SOFTWARE COMMUNICATIONS PVT. LTD,MUMBAI vs. ACIT CIR 16(1) , MUMBAI
Before: SHRI. NARENDRA KUMAR BILLAIYA, AM & MS. KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL, JM UTV Software Communications Private Limited Star House, Urmi Estate, 95, Ganpatrao Kadam Marg, Lower Parel (W), Mumbai – 400 013. Vs. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle – 16(1) Room No. 467, 4th Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, Maharishi Karve Road, Mumbai – 400020. PAN/GIR No. AAACU4122G (Appellant) : (Respondent)
Per Kavitha Rajagopal, J M:
This appeal has been filed by the assessee, challenging the final assessment order dated 30.07.2022 of the learned Assessing Officer (‘ld. AO’ for short), passed u/s.
143(3) r.w.s. 144C(13) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act'), pursuant to the direction of the Hon'ble Dispute Resolution Panel (‘Hon'ble DRP’ for short) dated
29.06.2022 u/s. 144C(5) of the Act, pertaining to the Assessment Year (‘A.Y.’ for short)
2018-19. 2. The assessee intends to withdraw the present appeal and had made a written submission on March, 2025 to that effect stating that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute
UTV Software Communications Private Limited through the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 along with the relevant forms as per the DTVSV 2024 scheme.
3. Upon perusal of the same, we deem it fit to dismiss the appeal filed by the assessee as withdrawn with the liberty that the assessee may revive the appeal if the same has not been settled in the DTVSV scheme, if and when necessary.
4. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open court on 24.03.2025 (NARENDRA KUMAR BILLAIYA)
JUDICIAL MEMBER
Mumbai; Dated: 24.03.2025
Karishma J. Pawar (Stenographer)
Copy of the Order forwarded to:
The Appellant 2. The Respondent 3. CIT- concerned 4. DR, ITAT, Mumbai 5. Guard File BY ORDER,
(Dy./Asstt.