(CENTRAL-2) vs. (P) LTD
What did the High Court hold?
The Revenue stated that in terms of CBDT Circular No. 21/2015, these appeals were not pressed. The Court also noted that on merits, the appeals required dismissal based on a previous decision.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed appeals against the respondent company. The tax effect in these appeals was below Rs. 20,00,000/-.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeals filed by the Revenue should be dismissed due to low tax effect as per CBDT circular and on merits based on previous High Court decisions.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
ITA 973-975/2015
Page 1 of 2
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 14. +
ITA 973/2015
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL-2)
..... Appellant Through: Ms Suruchi Aggarwal, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms Vibhooti Malhotra, Junior Standing Counsel with Ms Radhika Gupta, Advocate.
versus
COMPUTER ENGINEERING SERVICES INDIA (P) LTD
..... Respondent
Through:
AND 16. +
ITA 975/2015
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL-2)
..... Appellant Through: Ms Suruchi Aggarwal, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms Vibhooti Malhotra, Junior Standing Counsel with Ms Radhika Gupta, Advocate.
versus
COMPUTER ENGINEERING SERVICES INDIA (P) LTD
..... Respondent
Through
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/04/2026 at 21:43:54
ITA 973-975/2015
Page 2 of 2
O R D E R %
18.12.2015 CM No.31183/2015 in ITA 973/2015 CM No.31185/2015 in ITA 975/2015 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. The application stands disposed of. ITA Nos.973/2015 & 975/2015 3. The tax effect in each of these appeals is below Rs. 20,00,000/-. Counsel for the Revenue states that in terms of Circular No.21/2015 dated 10th December, 2015 issued by Central Board Direct Taxes (‘CBDT’), these appeals are not pressed. 4. In any event on merits, these appeals require to be dismissed in terms of the decision dated 28th July, 2015 of this Court in ITA No.511/2015 (Commissioner of Income Tax, (Central-II) v. P. D. Associates (P.) Ltd.). 5. The appeals are accordingly dismissed.
S.MURALIDHAR, J
VIBHU BAKHRU, J DECEMBER 18, 2015/MK This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/04/2026 at 21:43:54
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Vinay Singh vs. Union Of INDIAAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Aaradhyam Infrabuilders PVT LTD vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026