SAROVAR HOTELS PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- 3, MUMBAI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal noted that the order giving effect to the PCIT's order was acceptable to the assessee. Consequently, the assessee did not wish to proceed with the appeal, and the grounds raised were dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed by the PCIT under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2016-17. During the hearing, the appellant's Authorized Representative (AR) filed a letter seeking to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee can withdraw their appeal during the tribunal proceedings after accepting the order giving effect to the PCIT's revisionary order.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SMT. BEENA PILLAI & SHRI OMKARESHWAR CHIDARA
Assessment Year: 2016-17 Sarovar Hotels Private Vs Principal Limited Commissioner of 42, Mittal Chambers, Income Tax-3 Nariman Point, Mumbai Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. 400021 Road, Mumbai 40020 PAN: AAACS8083L (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by Ms. Simoni Shah Respondent by Mr. R.A. Dhyani, CIT D.R. Date of Hearing 27.03.2025 Date of Pronouncement 28.03.2025 ORDER Per: Smt. Beena Pillai, J.M.: The present appeal arises out of order dated 21/03/2024 passed by Ld. PCIT-3, Mumbai for assessment year 2016-17 u/s. 263 of the Act.
At outset the Ld. AR has filed letter dated 26/03/2025 (scanned and annexed here under) seeking to withdraw the present appeal. “With reference to the above and under instructions from the above referred assesse, we wish to sate as under: We, the undersigned, wish to state that in connection with the appeal filed before the Hon’ble Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in case of Sarovar Hotels Private Limited for the captioned assessment year, the case is scheduled for hearing on 27.03.2025. We wish to inform your honour that the assessee request before the Hon’ble Tribunal to grant permission to withdraw the appeal.
Assessment Year: 2016-17 Sarovar Hotels Pvt Ltd. Should your honour require any further clarification, please let us know.” 2.1. The Ld. AR submitted that, order giving effect to order the u/s. 263 order as passed by the Ld. AO which is acceptable to the assessee and assessee do not wish to proceed with the present appeal based on the above submissions the appeal is allowed to be withdraw. 3. Accordingly, grounds raised by the assesse is dismissed as withdraw.
In the result appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdraw.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Ritu Gautam Proprietor Of Ms Heritage International vs. Additional Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Appeals Ii Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026