Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
$~23-27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA Nos.343/2013, 352/2013, 362/2013, 360/2013 & 361/2013
ONGC VIDESH LTD.
..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Prakash Kumar, Advocate.
versus
ITO, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION
..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rohit Madan, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Jr. Standing Counsel and Mr. Akash Vajpai, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA
O R D E R %
23.03.2015
In these cases, the assessee is aggrieved by a common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 16.11.2012. It is pointed out that the assessee has filed applications under Section 254 (2) for rectification on the ground that certain contentions made by it were not dealt with in the impugned order. In similar circumstances, this Court had been adopting a consistent approach that the issues sought to be urged as questions of law would be taken up in appropriate proceedings after the decision of the ITAT. In these circumstances, the appeals are accordingly dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to the appellant to urge any question including those raised in the present cases in the light of the final This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/04/2026 at 22:05:59
order to be made by the ITAT in their applications under Section 254(2). The ITAT shall endeavour to complete its proceedings in those applications and render final order at its earliest convenience and preferably within four months from today.
The appeals are dismissed as withdrawn but in the above terms.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
R.K.GAUBA, J MARCH 23, 2015 /vikas/ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/04/2026 at 22:05:59