BDA PARTNERS LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, INTERNATIONAL TAX CIRCLE 1(2)(2), MUMBAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had submitted that the appeal should be treated as withdrawn. Considering the submissions, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, with liberty to revive it if the DTVSV application did not go through.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of assessment. During the pendency of the appeal, the assessee filed an application under the Direct Tax Vivad se Viswas Scheme, 2024 (DTVSV), which was processed and a certificate was issued.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal can be dismissed as withdrawn when the assessee has opted for the Vivad se Viswas Scheme?
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “I” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JM &
Appellant) : Respondent) : Ms. Forum Gudhka, AR Appellant /Assessee by : Shri Krishna Kumar, Sr. DR Revenue / Respondent by Date of Hearing : 27.03.2025 Date of Pronouncement : 01.04.2025 O R D E R Per Padmavathy S, AM:
This appeal by the assessee is against the final order of assessment passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (T)-Circle-1(2)(2), Mumbai under section 143(3) r.w.s. 144C)13) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) dated 23.10.2023 for AY 2021-22.
2 ITA 4637/Mum/2023 BDA Partners Limited
We heard the parties. The assessee vide letter dated 18.02.2025 submitted that the assessee has filed under the aegis of the Direct Tax Vivad se Viswas Scheme, 2024 (DTVSV) an application in Form No.1 and that the application has been processed culminating in the issue of certificate dated 14.02.2025 in Form No.2. The assessee accordingly submitted that the appeal filed by the assessee shall be treated as withdrawn. In the light of the above submissions, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to the assessee to revive the appeal in the event of the application filed under DTVSV does not go through. Hence the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In result, the appeal of assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
More judgments on Section 144C(13)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 486/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 498/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2128/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4558/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026