SHIRISH ARVIND JOSHI ,MUMBAI vs. ITO, WARD, 2(2), KALYAN

That, the impugned order dated 08/11/2024 issued u/s. 250 is passed against the basic principle of natural justice.

That, the assessee had in incurred a loss in the said financial year from trading in future and options. In this all statements as regards to this, had been already given in assessment. Our contention is that we have done trading in future & option shares. Hence, we request you to consider this as a Business of Trading volume comprises of both future & option. In this turnover is calculated on the basis of profit & loss summation. In this we request you to kindly treat the difference (Profit Loss) which is below 1 Cr Limit of Audit, which is the method of Calculating turnover in future & option. As a result of this, there is no need to conduct Audit. Hence, we request you to delete Penalty Proceedings initiated against under section 271B of ITR Act 1961. An Appellant reserve right to add points in the course of an Appeal

That the appellant craves leave to add, to amend, modify, rescind, supplement or alter any of the Grounds stated here-in-above, either before or at the time of hearing of this appeal”

This appeal is filed against the order of Ld. CIT(A) confirming the penalty of Rs.1,50,000/- which has levied u/s. 271B of the Act by the Ld.AO vide his order dated, 23/03/2022. 3. At the outset it has been submitted by the Ld.AR that, the assessee has filed an application under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme (VSVS), with intention to settle the dispute. In view of this fact the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the assessee would be at liberty to revive the appeal in case his application under VSV Scheme does not become final. 4. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open court on 03.04.2025. BEENA PILLAI RENU JAUHRI (न्यधनयक सदस्य/JUDICIAL MEMBER) (लेखधकधर सदस्य/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER