RAJ CHARITABLE TRUST,MUMBAI vs. CIT (EXEMPTIONS), MUMBAI, MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal considered the assessee's reasons and, in the interest of natural justice, granted a further opportunity. The appeal is remitted back to the CIT(E) to reconsider the final registration under Section 12AB afresh, based on the documents to be filed by the assessee. The assessee is directed to submit all necessary documents without seeking unnecessary adjournments.
What were the facts?
Raj Charitable Trust, an educational trust, applied for final registration under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(E) rejected the application under Section 12AB due to incomplete documentation and the assessee's failure to respond to notices. The assessee appealed, explaining that a lack of a full-time accountant and lay trustees led to the non-compliance.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(E) was justified in rejecting the application for final registration of an educational trust under Section 12AB due to non-submission of documents, and if the assessee should be granted another opportunity for compliance.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JM &
Appellant) : Respondent) Appellant /Assessee by : Shri Bhupendra Shah, AR : Shri R.R. Makwana- Sr. DR Revenue / Respondent by : 15.04.2025 Date of Hearing Date of Pronouncement : 23.04.2025 O R D E R Per Padmavathy S, AM:
This appeal by the assessee is against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) Mumbai [In short 'CIT(E)'] dated 25.12.2024.
The assessee is an educational trust engaged in the activity of imparting education and not for profit motive. The assessee applied for final registration under section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) on 18.06.2024 in Form 10AB. The CIT(E) after perusing the applications submitted by the assessee found that the Raj Charitable Trust application was not complete and all the documents required to be accompanying the application were not furnished by the assessee. The CIT(E) accordingly issued a notice on 17.10.2024 requesting the assessee to furnish the complete set of documents mentioned in Rule 17A(2) of Income Tax Rules, 1962 (The Rules). The assessee in response filed a letter seeking adjournment to furnish the required details. Subsequently, the CIT(E) issued two more notices dated 10.12.2024 and 18.12.2024. Since the assessee has not filed any response, the CIT(E) rejected the application seeking registration under section 12AB of the Act. The assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal against the order of the CIT(E).
We heard the parties and perused the material on record. The primary reason for CIT(E) to reject the registration is that the assessee has not filed the required documents and has not responded to the notices issued in this regard. The ld. AR during the course of hearing submitted that the assessee does not have a full time Accountant to look after the accounts and the taxation matters and therefore could not collate the various documents as required by the CIT(E). The ld. AR further submitted that the other Trustees of the assessee are ordinary lay persons and therefore could not respond to the notices in time. Accordingly the ld. AR prayed for one more opportunity to submit that relevant documents before the CIT(E). Considering the facts peculiar to the case and in the interest of natural justice and fair play, we are inclined to give one more opportunity to the assessee. Accordingly, the appeal is remitted back to the CIT(E) to consider the issue of final registration under section 12AB of the Act afresh based on the documents filed by the assessee and decide in accordance with law. The assessee is directed to file the necessary documents before the CIT(E) that are required in connection with the final registration under section 12AB of the Act without seeking unnecessary adjournments. It is ordered accordingly.
More judgments on Section 12A
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S B.K. Agency Under The Proprietor Of Bhola Prasad vs. The Chief Commissioner, CGSTPatna · 2 Nov 2026
- Shree Hanumant Steel Traders vs. Assistant CommissionerChhattisgarh · 1 Nov 2026
- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026