← Back to search

TEJORA TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED,THANE vs. DCIT, MUMBAI

PDF
ITA 510/MUM/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 April 20252 pages

Before: MS. KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL, JM & SHRI. OMKARESHWAR CHIDARA, AM Tejora Technologies Limited Shop No. 2, A Wing, Swagatam Complex, Shraddha CHSL, Jesal Park, Bhayandar (East), Thane – 401105. Vs. DCIT Room No. 1925, 19th Floor, Air India Building, Narimon Point, Mumbai – 400064. PAN/GIR No. AACCR4375E (Appellant) : (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri. Neeraj Mangla, CA
For Respondent: Shri. Hemanshi Joshi, SR. DR.
Hearing: 03.04.2025Pronounced: 25.04.2025

Per Kavitha Rajagopal, J M:

This appeal has been filed by the assessee, challenging the order of the learned
Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) 54, Mumbai (‘ld. CIT(A)’ for short), National
Faceless Appeal Centre (‘NFAC’ for short) passed u/s.250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961
(‘the Act'), pertaining to the Assessment Year (‘A.Y.’ for short) 2012-13. 2. The learned Authorised Representative (‘ld. AR’ for short) for the assessee filed an application during the course of hearing stating that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute through the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 along with Form 1
DTVSV 2024. Tejora Technologies Ltd.

3.

Upon perusal of the same, we deem it fit to dismiss the appeal filed by the assessee as withdrawn with the liberty that the assessee may revive the appeal if the same has not been settled in the DTVSV scheme, if necessary. 4. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open court on 25.04.2025 (OMKARESHWAR CHIDARA) JUDICIAL MEMBER

Mumbai; Dated: 25.04.2025
Karishma J. Pawar (Stenographer)

Copy of the Order forwarded to:

1.

The Appellant 2. The Respondent 3. CIT- concerned 4. DR, ITAT, Mumbai 5. Guard File BY ORDER,

(Dy./Asstt.

TEJORA TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED,THANE vs DCIT, MUMBAI | BharatTax