EVIDEN INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS ATOS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED),MUMBAI vs. JURISDICTIONAL AO - DCIT, CIRCLE 14(1)(1), MUMBAI ASSESSMENT UNIT, INCOME TAX DEPT, MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee to withdraw the present appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an assessment order. The assessee's AR submitted that duplicate appeals were filed (electronically and physically), and prayed to withdraw the present electronic appeal. The revenue had no objection.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee can withdraw the appeal filed electronically due to inadvertent filing of duplicate appeals.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Eviden India Private Limited v. DCIT – 14(1)(1) Room No. 432, 4th Floor (formerly known as Atos India Private Limited) Aayakar Bhavan Unit No. 1402 & 1403, Supremus, E Wing M.K. Marg - 400020 I Think Techno Campus, Kanjurmarg East Maharashtra Mumbai – 400042, Maharashtra PAN No. AAACO2461J (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) Assessee Represented by : Ms. Kinjal Patel CA Department Represented by : Shri Ajey Kumar Ojha, Sr.DR Date of Conclusion of hearing : 29.04.2025 Date of Pronouncement of Order : 29.04.2025 Order under section 254(1) of Income Tax Act PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER;
The appeal by the assessee is directed against the assessment order passed under section 143rws 144C(13) dated 22.10.2024, passed in pursuance of directions of Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP).
This appeal was listed for hearing on 29.04.2025, the Learned Authorised Representative (Ld.AR) of the assessee submitted that due to inadvertence assessee has filed duplicate appeals i.e., once electronically and thereafter physically, both appeals are listed separately. Thus, the Ld.AR of the assessee prayed that assessee may be allowed to withdraw the appeal filed electronically i.e., in the present appeal. Other appeal of the assessee being is listed for hearing on 01.05.2025.
On the other hand, learned senior departmental representative (Sr. DR) for the Revenue has no objection if appeal of the assessee is allowed to withdraw and appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
Eviden India Private Limited 4. Considering the prayer of the Ld.AR of the assessee, assessee is allowed to withdraw the present appeal. Resultantly, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. 5. In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open Court on 29th April, 2025. Sd/-/- Sd/-/- GIRISH AGRAWAL PAWAN SINGH ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER
More judgments on Section 144C(13)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 486/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 498/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2128/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4558/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Nanda Contruction PVT. LTD., Angul vs. Additional Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, SundergarhOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Utkal Suppliers,Ganjam vs. Assistant Commissioner Of CT And GST, Ganjam-I Circle,GanjamOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of Hte Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026