UTTARI BHARAT SABHA,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (E)-2(4), INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the timeline for filing Form 10AB has been extended by CBDT circulars due to hardships faced by charitable institutions. The issue of condoning the delay in filing Form 10B and the claimed deduction were remitted back to the CIT(A).
What were the facts?
The assessee, a charitable trust, filed its return of income. The CPC intimation denied a deduction of Rs. 1,06,03,220/- for not filing Form 10B. The CIT(A) upheld this disallowance.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing Form 10B can be condoned, and whether the deduction claimed by the assessee is allowable in accordance with law.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(1),Section 11(5),Section 11(2),Section 139,Section 119,Section 12AB
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “F” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SMT. BEENA PILLAI & SMT. RENU JAUHRI
Per: Smt. Beena Pillai, J.M.: The present appeal filed by the assessee arises out of order dated 24/12/2024 passed by ADDL/JCIT (A)-2, VISAKHAPATNAM for assessment year 2017-18 on following grounds of appeal : “ Ground of Appeal No 1 :- CIT Appeals erred in confirming and upheld assessment order u/s 143(1) issued by CPC A.Y. 2017
18. Uttari Bharat Sabha Grounds of Appeal
No 2 :- The CPC erred in disallowance of Rs 1,06,03,220/- from Gross Total Income for money invested in forms specified under section 11(5) for compliance of provision of section 11(2) of IT Act Grounds of Appeal No 3 :- The Assessee prays to Condone for delay in filing Form
10. Grounds of Appeal No 4 :- The CPC erred in Levying Interest” Brief facts of the case are as under:
The assessee is charitable trust and was established with the object to provide Education to students of weaker section. The assessee filed its return of income on 31/03/2018. 2.1 The CPC vide Order dated 16/03/2019 passed intimation under section 143(1)(a) of the IT Act by denying the deduction towards income applied towards the object of trust Rs. 1,06,03,220/- for not filing Form 10B.
On an appeal before the Ld.CIT(A), the disallowance was upheld.
Aggrieved by the order of the Ld.CIT(A), assessee is in appeal before this Tribunal.
Ground of Appeal
No. 1 is against the disallowance of Rs. 1,06,03,220/- towards amount applied for object of the Trust. The Ld.AR relied on Circular No.2/2020 dated 03/01/2020, issued by the CBDT, to support the condonation of delay in filing of Form No. 10B for year under consideration. He submitted that, in all cases where the Audit Report for the previous year was obtained before the filing of return of income and has been furnished subsequent to the filing of the return of income, but A.Y. 2017
18. Uttari Bharat Sabha before the date specified under section 139 of the Act is to be condoned. 4.1 In the Light of the above Circular the Ld.AR prayed that the addition of Rs.1,06,03,220/- made in the Intimation under Section 143(1)(a) should be set aside. 4.2 On the contrary, the Ld.DR submitted that, it is only u/s. 119 of the act wherein the CBDT could consider the condonation of delay in filing Form 10B belatedly. He thus relied on the orders passed by authorities below. We have perused the submissions advanced by both sides in the light of records placed before us.
5. The only issue in this appeal is against the order of Ld.CIT(A) rejecting the appeal filed by the assessee for non-filing of Form 10B within the due date. 5.1. It is noted that the timeline prescribed for filing Form No. 10AB for registration under section 12AB in the case of assessee has been extended vide various CBDT circulars, vide Circular No. 6/2023 dated 24/05/2023 and Circular 7 dated 25/04/2024, after considering the genuine hardship faced by charitable institutions. We therefore remit this issue to the file of Ld.CIT(A) to condone the delay in filing Form 10B as per the CBDT circular in accordance with law. We also remand the appeal back to the Ld.CIT(A) to consider the deduction claimed by the assessee in accordance with law. Needless to say that proper opportunity of being heard must be granted to assessee in accordance with law.
More judgments on Section 11(5)
- Ramkrishna Bajaj Charitable Trust, Mumbai vs Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax, Circle…ITA 66/MUM/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Indian Roads Congress, New Delhi vs Income Tax Exemption, Ward 1(2), New DelhiITA 1516/DEL/2026[2012 - 2013]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026
- Rkkr Foundation, Chandigarh vs DCIT, Exemption Circle 1, ChandigarhITA 477/CHANDI/2024[2018-19]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Rkkr Foundation, Chandigarh vs DCIT, Exemption Circle 1, ChandigarhITA 477/CHANDI/2024[2018-19]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Lala Sohana Mal Jagmohan Lal Khanna… vs CIT Exemptions, ChandigarhITA 3646/DEL/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2025-26
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Darbesh Medical Enterprise vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 15 Oct 2026
- Smt. Amna Baghel vs. State Bank Of INDIAMadhya Pradesh · 14 Oct 2026
- Gr Infra Projects Limited Ratlam Through Its Authorized Signatory Mr. Pankaj Das vs. The State Of Madhya PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 14 Oct 2026
- Harshita Seeds vs. Idbi BankMadhya Pradesh · 14 Oct 2026
- Rajdeep vs. Branch ManagerMadhya Pradesh · 14 Oct 2026