M/S. MEDICAL SOLUTIONS (INDIA) PRIVATE LTD ,MUMBAI vs. ITO CIRCLE (2)(1), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that brought forward unabsorbed depreciation can be set off against income from capital gains, subject to factual verification by the AO. The matter was restored to the AO for a fresh assessment.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a private limited company, adjusted brought forward unabsorbed depreciation against long-term capital gains. The AO disallowed this, a decision upheld by the CIT(A). The revenue challenged this before the Tribunal.
What were the issues?
Whether brought forward unabsorbed depreciation can be set off against long-term capital gains.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Solvent & Vanaspati Industries Ltd. 16 DTR 492 (Asr Trib.) 2. Suresh Industries Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT6 citing27 Taxmann.com 203 · 2012 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH MUMBAI
PER SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM: The present appeal has been filed by the revenue challenging the impugned order 19.02.2024 passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’), by the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (NFAC) for the assessment year 2021-22. 2. The only ground raised by the Assessee relates to Challenging the order of denial of adjustment made by the 2 M/s. Medical Solutions (Ind) Pvt Ltd., Mumbai
assessee of unabsorbed depreciations against the long term capital gain earned during the year.
In this regard, I have heard the counsels for both the parties, Perused the material placed on record, judgments cited before me and the orders passed by the revenue au
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 72
- Eurofins Peenya Resources Private Limited… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 1116/BANG/2023[2016-17]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Karnavati Rolling Mills Private Limited… vs The ITO, Ward-2(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 1714/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- DCIT-13.3.2, Mumbai vs Zume India Private Limited, MumbaiITA 9496/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Aquarius Transnational, Mumbai vs ITO-12(1)(1), Mumbai, Aayakar BhawanITA 5553/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed18 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Nipro India Corporation Pvt Ltd, Pune vs DCIT Satara Circle, SataraITA 2723/PUN/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S South INDIA Trading Company vs. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Rishi Stonex vs. The State Of Assam And 5 OthersGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- Gopal Datt vs. Vishal Kumar SharmaUttarakhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Do Nam Enterprise And Anr vs. The Union Of INDIA And 2 OrsGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- M Sundaravel vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central GST And Central ExciseMadras · 13 Oct 2026