M/S. CENTECH ENGINEERS PVT LTD,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(1)(1), MUMBAI
IN THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH,
MUMBAI
BEFORE SHRI NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY, JUDICIAL
MEMBER
&
SMT. RENU JAUHRI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
आयकर अपील सं./ITA No. 933/MUM/2025
(निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year :2014-15)
M/s. Centech Engineers
Pvt. Ltd.
103A, Regency A Wingsec
No. 3A Plot No. 146,
Kandivali (W), Mumbai,
Maharashtra-400067
v/s.
बिधम
NFAC, Delhi
Ward 12(1)(1), Mumbai
स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No: AACCC8510E
Appellant/अपीलधर्थी
..
Respondent/प्रनिवधदी
निर्ााररती की ओर से /Assessee by:
Mr. Maulik Chokshi
रधजस्व की ओर से /Revenue by:
Shri R. A. Dhyani
सुिवधई की िधरीख / Date of Hearing
07.05.2025
घोर्णध की िधरीख/Date of Pronouncement
15.05.2025
आदेश / O R D E R
PER RENU JAUHRI [A.M.] :-
This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the Learned
Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Mumbai/National Faceless Appeal
Centre, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “CIT(A)”] dated 25.03.2024 passed u/s.
250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as “Act”] for Assessment Year [A.Y.] 2014-15. P a g e | 2
A.Y. 2014-15
M/s. Centech Engineers Pvt. Ltd.
The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal: “1. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, and in law, the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax / Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has passed impugned orders, without juri iction. 2. That on the facts and in the circumstances, and in law, the Appellate Authorities has not followed the principal of natural justice and has passed impugned orders without application of mind.”
At the outset, it is seen that the assessment order has been passed by the ACIT, Circle 2(1)(1), Bengaluru u/s 144 of the Act on 06.12.2016. Against this order, the assessee preferred an appeal before Ld. CIT(A) and the same was dismissed exparte vide order dated 25.03.2024. The assessee has filed an appeal against the order of the Ld. CIT(A) before the ITAT Mumbai benches on the ground that its address is that of Mumbai. However, in view of the fact that the assessment order has been passed by ACIT, Circle-2(1)(1), Bengaluru, the appeal should have been filed before the Bengaluru Benches. 4. In view of the above facts and circumstances, the assessee seeks to withdraw this appeal, to which Ld. DR has not objected. We, accordingly, dismissed the appeal as withdrawn with liberty to the assessee to file a fresh appeal before the Bengaluru Benches of the Tribunal. 5. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open court on 15.05.2025. NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY RENU JAUHRI (न्यधनयक सदस्य/JUDICIAL MEMBER) (लेखधकधर सदस्य/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
P a g e | 3
A.Y. 2014-15
M/s. Centech Engineers Pvt. Ltd.
Place: म ुंबई/Mumbai
दिन ुंक /Date 15.05.2025
अननकेत स ुंह र जपूत/ स्टेनो
आदेश की प्रनतनलनि अग्रेनित/Copy of the Order forwarded to :
1. अपीलार्थी / The Appellant
2. प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent.
3. आयकर आयुक्त / CIT
4. विभागीय प्रविविवि, आयकर अपीलीय अविकरण DR, ITAT,
Mumbai
5. गार्ड फाईल / Guard file.
सत्यानित प्रनत ////
आदेशािुसार/ BY ORDER,
सहायक िंजीकार (Asstt.