GANESH GRAMASTHA SEVA MANDAL,MUMBAI vs. ITO 102, EXEM. WARD 1(3), MUMBAI
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “G” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI NARENDRA KUMAR BILLAIYASHRI SANDEEP SINGH KARHAILGanesh Gramastha Seva Mandal, Vazira Gaothan, L.T. Road, Borivali – W, Mumbai - 400091 PAN : AAATG2886L
PER SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL, J.M.
The assessee has filed the present appeal challenging the impugned order dated 08.10.2024, passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act,
1961 (“the Act”) by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals),
National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, [“learned CIT(A)”], for the assessment year 2018-19. 2. At the time of the hearing, the learned AR referred to a letter dated
29.04.2025 filed by the assessee, submitting that the assessee has opted for 2
Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 and filed the declaration in Form no.1 on 29.01.2025. Along with the letter mentioned above, the assessee has filed a copy of Form no.2 dated 12.03.2025, whereby the amount of Rs.
11,52.243 has been determined to be payable by the assessee towards a full and final settlement of the tax arrears. The assessee has also placed on record a challan dated 28.04.2025 in respect of payment of the aforesaid amount determined to be payable vide Form no.2. 3. Accordingly, upon perusal of the aforesaid documents and the letter dated 29.04.2025 filed by the assessee, the present appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open Court on 15/05/2025 NARENDRA KUMAR BILLAIYA ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL JUDICIAL MEMBER
MUMBAI, DATED: 15/05/2025
Prabhat
Copy of the order forwarded to:
(1)
The Assessee;
(2)
The Revenue;
(3)
The PCIT / CIT (Judicial);
(4)
The DR, ITAT, Mumbai; and (5)
Guard file.
By Order