ITO 17(3)(1), MUMBAI, BKC, MUMBAI vs. HINA ALOK KOTHARI, MUMBAI
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “J (SMC
Before: SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEE, JM & MS PADMAVATHY S, AM
Per Padmavathy S, AM:
This appeal by the revenue is against the final order of assessment passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (A)/Addl./JCIT(A)-1, Ahmedabad under section 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) dated 27.05.2024 for AY
2012-13. 2. We heard the ld DR. The assessee vide letter dated 01.05.2025submitted that the assessee has filed under the aegis of the Direct Tax Vivad se Viswas
2 ITA 3739/Mum/2024 Hina Alok Kothari
Scheme, 2024 (DTVSV) an application in Form No.1 on 29.01.2025 and that the application is under process for the issue of certificate in Form No.2. During the course of hearing the ld DR did not raise any objection to the appeal being treated as withdrawn since the assessee has filed an application under DTVSV with a liberty to revive the appeal in case the application under DTVSV does not materialise. In the light of the above submissions, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to the revenue to revive the appeal in the event of the application filed under DTVSV does not go through.
In result, the appeal of revenue is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open court on 22-05-2025. (ANIKESH BANERJEE) (PADMAVATHY S)
Judicial Member Accountant Member
*SK, Sr. PS
Copy of the Order forwarded to :
1. The Appellant
2. The Respondent
3. DR, ITAT, Mumbai
4. 5. Guard File
CIT
BY ORDER,
(Dy./Asstt.