CHANDERAKANTA H LALIA,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ITO 28(1)(3), NAVI MUMBAI
Before: SHRI NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRYAssessment Year: 2014-15
Per : Narender Kumar Choudhry, Judicial Member:
This appeal has been preferred by the Assessee against the order dated 22.03.2024, impugned herein, passed by the National
Faceless Appeal Center (NFAC)/ Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax
(Appeals) (in short Ld. Commissioner) u/s 250 of the Income Tax
Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’) for the A.Y. 2014-15. Ms. Chanderakanta H Lalia
2
2. The Assessee, with an intention to settle the dispute amicably, has filed Form No.1 under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme,
2024 and ready to deposit the requisite amount to be determined by the Revenue Authority. Thus, the appeal of the Assessee is liable to be dismissed as withdrawn, however, with liberty to the parties to seek recalling of this order on non-settling of the dispute finally.
Thus, the appeal is allowed to be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as granted above.
Order pronounced in the open court on 04.06.2025. (NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY)
JUDICIAL MEMBER
* Kishore, Sr. PS
Copy to: The Appellant
The Respondent
The CIT, Concerned, Mumbai
The DR Concerned Bench
////
By Order
Dy/Asstt.