VIPIN ANAND,MUMBAI vs. WARD 16(1)(5), MUMBAI/, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRYAssessment Year: 2013-14
Per : Narender Kumar Choudhry, Judicial Member:
This appeal has been preferred by the Assessee against the order dated 31.12.2024, impugned herein, passed by the National
Faceless Appeal Center (NFAC)/ Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax
(Appeals) (in short Ld. Commissioner) u/s 250 of the Income Tax
Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’) for the A.Y. 2013-14. 2. The Assessee with an intention to settle the dispute amicably through Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, has already filed Form no.1 and the Revenue Authority has also issued form No. 2 and therefore the Assessee is accordingly willing to deposit the requisite amount on determination of tax liability or issuing Form no.4. Vipin Anand
2
3. The Ld. Dr did not refute the said factual aspect.
Thus, the appeal of the Assessee stands dismissed as withdrawn, however, with liberty to the Assessee to seek recalling on this order on non-settling the dispute finally.
Order pronounced in the open court on 11.06.2025. (NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY)
JUDICIAL MEMBER
* Disha Raut, Stenographer
Copy to: The Appellant
The Respondent
The CIT, Concerned, Mumbai
The DR Concerned Bench
////
By Order
Dy/Asstt.