← Back to search

M/S. SAI BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ITO, CIRCLE 27(3), MUMBAI, VASHI, NAVI MUMBAI

PDF
ITA 2899/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 June 20253 pages

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “C”, MUMBAI

Before: SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT & SHRI RAJ KUMAR CHAUHANM/s Sai Builders & Developers B12, Ashiana, Plot No. 15, Sector 17, Vashi Navi Mumbai-400 703 PAN: ABBFS0092C Vs. ITO Circle 27(3), IT Office, Vashi Railway Station Building, Navi Mumbai-400 703

Pronounced: 16.06.2025

PER RAJ KUMAR CHAUHAN (J.M.): 1. The appeal filed by the appellant/assessee against the order of National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [referred as Ld. CIT(A)], Mumbai dated 25.02.2025 passed u/s 250 of the Act for AY 2017-18 wherein the appeal of the assessee was dismissed. M/s Sai Builders and Developers 2. At the outset, our attention was drawn towards letter dated 12.06.2025 wherein the assessee has requested to withdraw the appeal. The operative portion of the letter extracted as under:- “In the aforesaid matter, the appellant was supposed to file the appeal against the impugned order dated 16.03.2022 under section 263 of the Act. However, the appellant had inadvertently filed the appeal against the consequential assessment order dated 15.03.2025 under section 143(3) r.w.s 263 of the Act. We, therefore, request the Hon'ble tribunal to kindly allow us to withdraw the appeal with the liberty to file a fresh appeal against the order dated 16.03.2022 under section 263 of the Act” 3. On the other hand, Ld. DR did not object to the said request of withdrawal. 4. Considering the contents of the letter as mentioned above, we allow the request of the assessee for withdrawing the present appeal. 5. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty to file afresh as per law. Order pronounced in the open court on 16.06.2025 (OM PRAKASH KANT) (RAJ KUMAR CHAUHAN) (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) (JUDICIAL MEMBER) Mumbai / Dated 16.06.2025 M/s Sai Builders and Developers Dhananjay, Sr.PS

Copy of the Order forwarded to:

1.

The Appellant 2. The Respondent. 3. CIT 4. DR, ITAT, Mumbai 5. Guard file. //// BY ORDER

(Asstt.

M/S. SAI BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS,NAVI MUMBAI vs ITO, CIRCLE 27(3), MUMBAI, VASHI, NAVI MUMBAI | BharatTax