COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI vs. NIT GIS LTD.

PDF · subscribers
ITA - 1209 / 2008HC Delhi21 October 20081 pages
For Petitioner: MR.R.D.JOLLY
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the High Court hold?

The Tribunal held in favour of the assessee, finding that expenses were correctly allocated and the department did not provide evidence of misallocation. The findings were considered pure findings of fact.

What were the facts?

The assessee claimed deduction under Section 80-IB for its Parwanoo unit. The dispute involved the allocation of expenses between the Parwanoo and non-Parwanoo units. The assessee maintained separate books of accounts and apportioned common expenses based on turnover.

What were the issues?

The key issue was the correct allocation of expenses between two separate business units for the purpose of claiming deduction under Section 80-IB. The tribunal examined whether the assessee had properly identified and debited expenses to the respective units.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 80-IB

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI . 21.10.2008 . Present: Mr R D Jolly with Mr Paras Chaudhary for the appellant. Mr Sriram Krishna for the respondent. . + ITA No.1209/2008 . This appeal is directed against the order dated 17.8.2007 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in ITA 519/Del/2005 relating to assessment year 2001-02. The issue that arose before the Tribunal was with regard to the deduction under Section 80-IB claimed by the assessee. The question that was there before the Tribunal was with regard to allocation of expenses between two separate units of the assessee which were styled as the Parwanoo and non- Parwanoo units. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) as well as the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held in favour of the assessee on facts. The Tribunal concluded that the Assessing Officer had not brought on record any instance of any expenditure being charged in another unit. The Tribunal noted that the assessee had maintained separate books of accounts and the expenditure exclusively incurred for the Parwanoo and non-Parwanoo businesses were identifiable and had been directly debited to their respective books. The common expenditure of the businesses were apportioned in the ratio of turnover and that the CIT (Appeals) had accepted this after examining the issue in . . detail. The Tribunal also noted that the department had not pointed out any item which had been incurred by the Parwanoo business and charged to the non- Parwanoo business so as to increase the profit of the Parwanoo business which resulted in higher deduction under Section 80 IB of the said Act. The findings returned by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) as well as the Tribunal are pure findings of fact. No substantial question of law arises for our consideration. The appeal is dismissed. . BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J . . RAJIV SHAKDHER, J October 21, 2008 Mb . . 4 .

More judgments on Section 80-IB

All 340 judgments and leading authorities on Section 80-IB →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →