← Back to search

LATA SATISH MAHAJAN ,MUMBAI vs. ITO WARD 4(1), THANE

PDF
ITA 2772/MUM/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai18 June 20252 pages

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai “A” Bench, Mumbai.

Before: Shri Sandeep Gosain(JM) & Shri Prabhash Shankar(AM) Lata Satish Mahajan Flat No. 1704, B Wing Edgeware Building Shivsai Paradise, Majiwada Thane West-400 601. Vs. ITO Ward 4(1) Qureshi Mansion Gokhale Road Thane Maharashtra-400602. PAN : AQQPM2012C

For Appellant: Shri Aditya Ramachandran
For Respondent: Shri Adiya Rai
Hearing: 05/06/2025Pronounced: 18/06/2025

Per Sandeep Gosain (JM) :-

This appeal filed by the assessee against the order dated 25.2.2025
passed by Ld. CIT(A) for A.Y. 2016-17. 2. At the very outset, we noticed that the assessee was ex-parte before the Ld. AO and also before Ld. CIT(A) and now before us Ld. AR has requested to send the matter for deciding the same on merits.

3.

We have heard Ld. Counsels of both parties at length and we found that no justifiable reason put forth by the assessee for not appearing before both the Revenue Authorities.

4.

Be that as it may, the Bench is of the view that the ends of justice would be met only if the issues between the parties are decided on merits after evaluating and appreciating the documents placed on record and relied upon by the assessee subject to nominal cost of Rs. 2000/- is imposed upon the assessee which is to be deposited in the “Prime Minister Relief Fund” with the direction to place on record copy of receipt before the Ld. AO within 30

Lata Satish Mahajan

2
days from the date of receipt of this order. Therefore, we restore the matter back to the file of AO for deciding it afresh by providing opportunity of hearing to the parties and allowing the assessee to place on record documents for substantiate his claim. With these directions, we restore the matter back to the file of Ld. AO to decide the matter afresh on merits after providing opportunity of hearing to both the parties. The assessee shall not seek adjournment on frivolous grounds and shall remain cooperative during the course of proceedings.

4.

Before parting, we make it clear that our decision to restore the matter back to Ld. AO shall in no way be construed as having any reflection or expression on the merits of the dispute, which shall be adjudicated by Ld. AO independently in accordance with law.

5.

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open Court on 18/06/2025. (PRABHASH SHANKAR) JUDICIAL MEMBER

Copy of the Order forwarded to :

1.

The Appellant 2. The Respondent. 3. CIT 4. DR, ITAT, Mumbai 5. Guard file.

BY ORDER,

////

(

LATA SATISH MAHAJAN ,MUMBAI vs ITO WARD 4(1), THANE | BharatTax