← Back to search

BHAVYA JATIN LATHIA,MUMBAI vs. ITO27(1)(2), VASHI

PDF
ITA 2020/MUM/2025[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 June 20253 pages

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI “B” BENCH : MUMBAI

Before: SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV & MS. KAVITHA RAJAGOPALAssessment Year : 2011-12

For Appellant: Shri Mandar Vaidya, Adv.
For Respondent: Shri Leyaqat Ali Aafaqui

PER VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, A.M :

This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the Learned
Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-National Faceless Appeal Centre
(NFAC), Delhi [„Ld.CIT(A)‟], dated 02-01-2025, pertaining to Assessment
Year (AY) 2011-12. 2. During the course of hearing, the Ld. AR has requested the Bench that the assessee is seeking permission to withdraw this appeal as the Ld.CIT(A) under the amended law has remitted the matter to the file of the AO for re-examination of the matter and the assessee shall be pursuing

2
the same before the AO and in this regard, a written request dated 19-06-
2025 seeking permission to withdraw subject appeal was also filed which has been placed on record.
3. The Ld.DR didn‟t raise any specific objection to such request for withdrawal of the subject appeal.
4. Having heard both the parties and taking into consideration the request so made by the Ld.AR on behalf of the assessee, we are inclined to allow this appeal of the assessee to be withdrawn and accordingly, dismiss this appeal as withdrawn.
5. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

Order pronounced in the open court on 20-06-2025 [MS. KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL]
[VIKRAM SINGH YADAV]
JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

Mumbai,
Dated: 20-06-2025

TNMM

3
Copy to :

1)
The Appellant
2)
The Respondent
3)
The CIT concerned
4)
The D.R, ITAT, Mumbai
5)
Guard file

By Order

Dy./Asst.

BHAVYA JATIN LATHIA,MUMBAI vs ITO27(1)(2), VASHI | BharatTax