← Back to search

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,MUMBAI vs. ADDL CIT (IT) RG 3, MUMBAI

PDF
ITA 2688/MUM/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 June 20252 pages

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “I” BENCH, MUMBAI

Before: MS PADMAVATHY S, AM & SHRI RAJ KUAMR CHAUHAN

For Appellant: Shri Mrunal Parekh (Virtually
For Respondent: Shri Satya Pal Kumar, CIT-DR
Hearing: 24.06.2025Pronounced: 25.06.2025

Per Padmavathy S, AM:

This appeal by the assessee is against the final order of assessment passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-56, Mumbai under section 143(3) r.w.s.
144C(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) dated 24.01.2017 for AY 2007-08. 2 ITA 2688/Mum/2017
General Electric Company
2. We heard the parties. The assessee vide letter dated 19.03.2025 submitted that the assessee has filed under the aegis of the Direct Tax Vivad se Viswas Scheme,
2024 (DTVSV) an application in Form No.1 and that the application has been processed culminating in the issue of certificate dated 11.03.2025 in Form No.2. It has also been brought to our notice that the assessee has paid the tax on 13.03.2025
as determined in Form No.2 and the copy of the challan in this regard is also submitted. The assessee accordingly submitted that the appeal filed by the assessee shall be treated as withdrawn. In the light of the above submissions, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to the assessee to revive the appeal in the event of the application filed under DTVSV does not go through.
Hence the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

3.

In result, the appeal of assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

Order pronounced in the open court on 25-06-2025. (RAJ KUAMR CHAUHAN) (PADMAVATHY S)
Judicial Member Accountant Member
*SK, Sr. PS
Copy of the Order forwarded to :
1. The Appellant
2. The Respondent
3. DR, ITAT, Mumbai
4. 5. Guard File
CIT
BY ORDER,

(Dy./Asstt.

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,MUMBAI vs ADDL CIT (IT) RG 3, MUMBAI | BharatTax