← Back to search

APURVA ASHWIN DESAI ,MUMBAI vs. ITO WARD 27(3)(1) , MUMBAI

PDF
ITA 1265/MUM/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai03 July 20253 pages

| आयकर अपील य अ
धकरण यायपीठ, मुंबई |
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
“A” BENCH, MUMBAI

BEFORE SHRI NARENDRA KUMAR BILLAIYA, HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
&
SHRI SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER

I.T.A. No. 1265/Mum/2025
Assessment Year: 2018-19

Apurva Ashwin Desai
702 Raji CHS, Ave Lane
60Ft Road, Rajawadi
Ghatkopar (E)
Mumbai - 400077
[PAN: AABPD2306D]
Vs
ITO, Ward 27(3)(1), Mumbai

अपीलाथ/ (Appellant)
 यथ/ (Respondent)

Assessee by :
None
Revenue by :
Shri Aditya M. Rai, Sr. D/R

सुनवाई क तार ख/Date of Hearing : 01/07/2025
घोषणा क तार ख /Date of Pronouncement: 03/07/2025

आदेश/O R D E R

PER NARENDRA KUMAR BILLAIYA, AM:

This appeal by the assessee is preferred against the order dated
03/02/2025 by NFAC, Delhi [hereinafter “the ld. CIT(A)”] pertaining to AY 2018-19. 2. The sum and substance of the grievance of the assessee is that the ld. CIT(A) erred in confirming the addition of Rs. 71,39,907/- made by the AO by disallowing the claim of interest paid on borrowed capital.
3. None appeared on behalf of the assessee in spite of notice. We decided to proceed ex-parte. The ld. D/R was heard at length. Case records carefully perused.

I.T.A. No. 1265/Mum/2025
2

4.

Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the assessee is an individual and is a partner in M/s. Sun VUB from which he derives income from share of profit. The assessee had borrowed funds for investing in partnership firm and on this borrowing, he has paid interest. The borrowing and the payment of interest has not been doubted but the claim of interest paid by the assessee on such borrowings has been disallowed for the simple reason that inadvertently, the same was claimed under the head “income from other sources”. 5. After giving a thoughtful consideration, we are of the considered view that once it has been accepted that the borrowed funds on which interest is paid is invested as capital in the partnership firm, any interest payment should be allowed as deduction from the share of profit and the interest received on capital. Merely because by an inadvertent mistake the interest has been show under the head “income from other sources”, the revenue should not be benefitted by such inadvertent error. We accordingly direct the AO to allow the claim of interest. 6. In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed. Order pronounced in the Court on 3rd July, 2025 at Mumbai. (SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

Mumbai, Dated 03/07/2025
*SC SrPs
*SC SrPs
*SC SrPs
*SC SrPs

I.T.A. No. 1265/Mum/2025
3

आदेश क तलप अ ेषत /Copy of the Order forwarded to :

1.

अपीलाथ! / The Appellant 2. "यथ! / The Respondent 3. संबं&धत आयकर आयु(त / Concerned Pr. CIT 4. आयकर आयु(त ) अपील ( / The CIT(A)- 5. वभागीय तन&ध ,आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, मुंबई /DR,ITAT, Mumbai, 6. गाड. फाई/ Guard file.

आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER,

APURVA ASHWIN DESAI ,MUMBAI vs ITO WARD 27(3)(1) , MUMBAI | BharatTax