THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. V.L.S.FINANCE LTD.
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court admitted the appeal on substantial questions of law concerning the assessee's claim for depreciation on vehicles under hire purchase agreements. The core issue is whether the assessee can claim depreciation when the vehicles are registered and used by the hirer.
What were the facts?
The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax against an ITAT order allowing depreciation on assets given on hire purchase. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned by the High Court.
What were the issues?
Whether depreciation can be claimed on assets under hire purchase agreements when ownership and usage are disputed. Whether the ITAT erred in allowing depreciation on assets not owned or used by the assessee in its business.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI . ITA 832/2010 . THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Rashmi Chopra, Advocate. . versus . V.L.S.FINANCE LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. V.N. Jha, Advocate . CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN . O R D E R 14.07.2010 CM No.11721/2010 (exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, application stands disposed of. CM No. 11722/2010 (condonation of delay) This is an application for condonation of delay of 176 days in refiling the appeal. Having heard Ms. Rashmi Chopra, learned counsel for appellant and Mr. V.N. Jha, learned counsel for respondent, we are . ITA 832/2010 page 1 of 3. . . of the considered opinion that there is sufficient cause warranting condonation of delay and accordingly, delay of 176 days in refiling the appeal stands condoned. Accordingly, application stands disposed of. . ITA 832/2010 The present appeal preferred under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961 (for brevity ?Act?) is admitted on the following substantial questions of law:- 1. Whether on a true and correct interpretation of the terms of the hire purchase agreement and on the vehicles being registered and also used by the hirer, the assessee can claim depreciation? . 2. Whether the ITAT erred in law and on merits in allowing depreciation on assets given on hire purchase agreements even though the same were neither owned nor used by the assessee in the course of its business? . Issue notice. Mr. V.N. Jha, learned counsel has entered appearance on behalf of the assessee. . ITA 832/2010 page 2 of 3. . . In view of the aforesaid, no further notice need to be issued. Filing of paper book is dispensed with.??? . . . CHIEF JUSTICE . . . MANMOHAN, J . JULY 14, 2010 js . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ITA 832/2010 page 3 of 3. . 17 $
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- Ajay Kumar @ Ajay Sharma vs. Union Of INDIA Rep Thr The Intelligence Officer, Directorate General Of GST Intelligence (Dggi)Jharkhand · 29 Oct 2026
- Korba Steel Castings vs. State Of ChhattisgarhChhattisgarh · 29 Oct 2026