← Back to search

RADHA KISHAN LALCHAND,THANE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 3(2), THANE, THANE

PDF
ITA 2235/MUM/2025[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai14 July 20252 pages

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
“SMC” BENCH, MUMBAI
BEFORE SHRI PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER
(Physical hearing)
RadhaKishanLalchand
Ground Floor, Three Petrol Pump LBS
Road, Thane
Maharashtra-400602. [PAN No. AAFFR1002C]

Vs
ITO, Ward-3(2), Thane
6th Floor, Ashar IT Park, Thane
West, Maharashtra-400604
Appellant / Assessee

Respondent / Revenue

Assessee by Sh. Chinmay Kathavate, CA
Revenue by Sh. Surendra Mohan, Sr. DR
Date of hearing
14.07.2025
Date of pronouncement
14.07.2025

Order under section 254(1) of Income Tax Act

PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER; 1. This appeal by assessee is directed against the order of Ld. CIT(A)/ADDL/JCIT(A)-1, Noida dated 20.06.2025 for assessment year (AY) 2015-16. 2. This appeal came up hearing on 14.07.2025. At the time of hearing the learned authorised representative (AR) of the assessee submits that he has instruction from assessee to withdraw the present appeal as the assessee has already been allowed relief by ld CIT(A) in his order dated 20.06.2025. The assessee was allowed relief on subsequent appeal filed against the order passed on application under section 154. The learned Senior departmental representative (ld. DR) for the revenue was fair enough not to oppose the withdrawal of the impugned appeal by the assessee. 3. Considering the prayer of ld AR of the assessee, present appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Radha Kishan Lalchand 2

4.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order was pronounced in the open Court on 14/07/2025 at the time of hearing. PAWAN SINGH JUDICIAL MEMBER

MUMBAI, Dated 14/07/2025
Biswajit

Copy of the order forwarded to:
(1)
The Assessee;
(2)
The Revenue;
(3)
The PCIT / CIT (Judicial);
(4)
The DR, ITAT, Mumbai; and (5)
Guard file.
By Order

RADHA KISHAN LALCHAND,THANE vs INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 3(2), THANE, THANE | BharatTax