AYUBALI KHAIRBALI QURESHI,MUMBAI vs. ITO, WARD, 16(2)(1), MUMBAI
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “K”, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEE & SMT. RENU JAUHRIAyubali Khairbali Quresh 30-4/A/4, Almarwah CHS, Millat Nagar, Andheri (W), Mumbai-400 053 PAN: AAEPQ2461P vs National Faceless Assessment Unit,Delhi / ITO, Ward No.16(2)(1), Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road, Mumbai-400 020 APPLICANT
Per Anikesh Banerjee (JM):
The instant appeal of the assesse was filed against the order of the National
Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter called, ‘Ld. CIT(A)] passed under section 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short, ‘the Act’) for Assessment Year
2020-21, date of order 23/02/2024. The impugned order emanated from the order of the Assessment Unit, Income-tax Department [hereinafter called, ‘Ld. AO]
passed under section 143(3) read with section 144B of the Act, date of order
23/09/2022. 2
ITA 6851/Mum /2024
Ayubali Kharbali Qureshi
The brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed the return of income under section 139(1) and declared taxable income amounting to Rs.61,65,790/- from professional fees and Income from other sources. The case was selected for scrutiny through CASS and accordingly, the assessment was completed after making addition under section 56(2)(x) of the Act towards difference in set-forth value and the value adopted by the