PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BENGALURU - 1, BENGALURU vs. M/S SUPRAJIT ENGINEERING LTD (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS M/S PHOENIX LAMPS LTD)

PDF · subscribers
ITA - 460 / 2022HC Delhi17 November 20222 pages
For Petitioner: ZOHEB HOSSAIN
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the High Court hold?

The Delhi High Court held that appeals against ITAT decisions lie only before the High Court within whose jurisdiction the Assessing Officer who passed the assessment order is situated. Therefore, the Delhi High Court lacked territorial jurisdiction to hear the appeal.

What were the facts?

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) passed an order on October 31, 2017. The Assessing Officer who passed the original assessment order is located in Noida, Uttar Pradesh. The appellant filed an appeal before the Delhi High Court.

What were the issues?

The key issue was the territorial jurisdiction of the High Court to hear an appeal against an ITAT order when the Assessing Officer is located in a different jurisdiction.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 127

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

$~S-44 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 460/2022 & CM APPL.49242/2022 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BENGALURU - 1, BENGALURU ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Zoheb Hossain, Sr.Standing Counsel with Mr.Vipul Agrawal and Mr.Parth Semwal, Jr.Standing Counsel. versus M/S SUPRAJIT ENGINEERING LTD (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS M/S PHOENIX LAMPS LTD) ..... Respondent Through: Dr.Shashwat Bajpai, Advocate with Mr.Akshay Anurag and Ms.Sanjana Sachdev, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA O R D E R % 17.11.2022 Present Income Tax Appeal has been filed challenging the Order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (‘ITAT’) dated 31st October, 2017 in ITA No. 2845/Del/2007 for the Assessment Year 2003-04. Learned counsel for the Appellant admits that the Assessing Officer, who has passed the assessment order is based in Noida (U.P.). The Supreme Court in Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax – I, Chandigarh vs. ABC Papers Limited, 2022 SCC OnLine SC 1036 has held as under:- This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/03/2026 at 00:26:17

“38. In conclusion, we hold that appeals against every decision of the ITAT shall lie only before the High Court within whose jurisdiction the Assessing Officer who passed the assessment order is situated. Even if the case or cases of an assessee are transferred in exercise of power under Section 127 of the Act, the High Court within whose jurisdiction the Assessing Officer has passed the order, shall continue to exercise the jurisdiction of appeal. This principle is applicable even if the transfer is under Section 127 for the same assessment year(s).” Consequently, this Court has no territorial jurisdiction to hear and decide the present appeal. Accordingly, the present appeal along with pending application is disposed of with liberty to the appellant to file the present appeal in a Court having territorial jurisdiction within twelve weeks. This Court clarifies that the rights and contentions of all the parties are left open. MANMOHAN, J MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J NOVEMBER 17, 2022 TS This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/03/2026 at 00:26:17

More judgments on Section 127

All 1,067 judgments and leading authorities on Section 127 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →