CIT vs. INDO ASIAN FUSEGEAR PVT LTD
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court found no substantial question of law and dismissed the revenue's appeal. This decision was based on a previous identical order by the same court which had also dismissed the revenue's appeal.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed deduction under Section 80IC for its unit in Parwanoo, Himachal Pradesh. The Assessing Officer disallowed a significant portion of this claim, but the Commissioner granted relief. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's order.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee's unit in Parwanoo qualified for deduction under Section 80IC, and if the revenue's appeal raised a substantial question of law.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI . . . ITA 598/2012 . . . CIT ..... Appellant . Through Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, sr. standing counsel with Ms. Gayatri Verma, Adv. . . . versus . . . INDO ASIAN FUSEGEAR PVT LTD ..... Respondent . Through . . . CORAM: . HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT . HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V.EASWAR . . . O R D E R . 16.10.2012 . . . The revenue claims to be aggrieved by the order dated 6.5.2011 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (?Tribunal?, for short) and urges that the Tribunal fell into error in directing deletion of disallowance to the extent of ` 12,40,27,143/- on account of deduction under Section 80IC of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (?Act?, for short). . The assessee had filed a return for the assessment year 2006-07, claiming deduction to the extent of `16,73,09,270/- out of the total income in the business shown at `18,30,57,005/-. The assessee stated that its claim was for the unit situated at Parwanoo, Himachal Pradesh which was the newly established unit w.e.f. 20.5.2003. The Assessing Officer proceeded to exclude the profits, earned with respect of Parwanoo unit and brought the amount to tax; the profit calculated by the Assessing Officer was `12,40,27,143/-. The assessee went in appeal to the Commissioner who granted relief holding that the Parwanoo unit qualified for benefit of exemption. The revenue?s appeal to the Tribunal was unsuccessful. At the outset this Court has been informed that in respect of the previous year i.e. assessment year 2005-06, the Tribunal has followed an identical order allowing the claim for relief in respect of Parwanoo unit under Section 80IC. That order was carried in appeal by revenue in ITA No.826/2011; the appeal was dismissed by this Court on 16.1.2012. This Court has seen the said order. In view of the reasons given in the order, this Court does not find that any substantial question of law arises. The appeal consequently fails and is dismissed. . . . . . S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J . . . . . . . R.V.EASWAR, J . OCTOBER 16, 2012 . vld . . . $ 49 .
More judgments on Section 80IC
- Neel Metal Products Ltd., New Delhi vs DCIT, Circle-18(1), New DelhiITA 5935/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: Disposed10 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- M/S. Neel Metal Products Ltd., New Delhi vs Addl. CIT, New DelhiITA 386/DEL/2017[2011-12]Status: Disposed10 Sept 2026AY 2011-12
- M/S Neel Metal Products Ltd., New Delhi vs ACIT, New DelhiITA 3919/DEL/2013[2009-10]Status: Disposed10 Sept 2026AY 2009-10
- Indus India, C/O Indus Appliances Pvt Ltd vs ITO, ParwanooITA 852/CHANDI/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed6 Aug 2026AY 2016-17
- Corbett Nature Reserve, Ramnagar vs Income Tax Officer, Ram NagarITA 65/RPR/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed28 Jul 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- Akshaya Consortium vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026