LUPIN LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -3, MUMBAI

PER OM PRAKASH KANT, AM

This appeal by the assessee is directed against revision order dated 25.03.2025 passed by the Ld. Principal Commissioner of Income-tax, Mumbai – 3 [in short ‘the Ld. PCIT’] for assessment year 2019-20. 2. At the very threshold, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the assessee submitted that against the aforesaid impugned order, the assessee had ina form and another electronically has be while the present
3272/Mum/2025. Th appeal is a duplicate to withdraw the same
2.1 In view of the a behalf of the assessee pending. Accordingly withdrawn.
3. In the result, th
Order pronounced (SANDEEP SING
JUDICIAL M
Mumbai;
Dated: 31/07/2025
Rahul Sharma, Sr. P.S.
Copy of the Order forward
1. The Appellant
2. The Respondent.
3. CIT
4. DR, ITAT, Mumbai
5. Guard file.

////

ITA advertently filed two appeals—
through electronic filing. Th een registered as ITA No. 32
t appeal stands registered he learned counsel submitted t e and, therefore, the assessee se e.
aforesaid submission and the re e, we find no reason to keep the y, the appeal, being a duplicate, he appeal of the assessee is dism d in the open Court on 31/07/202
d/- GH KARHAIL)
(OM PRAK
MEMBER
ACCOUNTA ded to :

BY ORDER

(Assistant Re

ITAT, Mu
Lupin Ltd
2
A No. 3272/MUM/2025
—one in physical he appeal filed
57/Mum/2025, as ITA
No.
that the instant eeks permission equest made on e present appeal is dismissed as missed.
5. /-
KASH KANT)
ANT MEMBER
R, gistrar) umbai