SOURABH HEMRAJ BORA HUF,MUMBAI vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and that the Ld. DR had no objection. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed appeals against the CIT(A)'s order for assessment years 2014-15 and 2015-16. The assessee had opted for settlement of tax disputes under the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme-2024'.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee's appeals can be dismissed as withdrawn consequent to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH
Before: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA & SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL
आदेश / O R D E R PER BENCH: The aforesaid appeals have been filed by the assessee against order dated 24.02.2025 passed by ld.CIT(A)-48 for the quantum of assessment passed u/s.147 for the A.Y.2014-15 & 2015-16.
In the aforesaid appeals, ld. Counsel for the assessee has submitted that assessee has opted for settlement of tax dispute under the ‘Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme-2024’ and has Respected Sir, Re: Prayer to permit the withdrawal of appeal as the appellant has settled the disputes under "Vivad-se-Vishwas, 2024' scheme in the case of Sourabh Hemraj Bora (HUF) Asst. Year: 2014-15 Appeal Nos. ITA-2782/Mum/2025 and 2783/Mum/2025 PAN-AAQHS0877P The abovesaid appeal matters are fixed for hearing on 05/08/2025. The assessee has settled the disputes under the Vivad-se-vishwas, 2024 scheme and Form No. 4 has been issued by PCIT-17, Mumbai on 10/07/2025. Accordingly, your honours are requested to permit the withdrawal of the appeals and oblige. Thanking you. Yours faithfully, Chartered Accountant
Ld. DR also did not have any objection.
Accordingly, appeals of the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn as the assessee has opted for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme-2024. In case application for VSVS does not materialize, assessee shall be at liberty to get the appeals restituted. With this liberty, appeals of the assessee are dismissed in-limine.
In the result, appeals of the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced on 5th August, 2025.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026